BPSC TRE cut-off marks: every round, by subject and category

The published cut-offs for TRE 1.0 and TRE 3.0, level by level — and the thing no other page tells you: they are out of 120, not 150.

Author: ProSyllabus Admin

Updated : 15 hours ago

Categories: Teaching Jobs, BPSC
Tags: BPSC TRE cut off, BPSC TRE 4.0 cut off, Bihar teacher cut off marks, BPSC TRE 3.0 cut off
Post ThumbnailView Complete Article

Checked 22 September 2026. These are published historical cut-offs and do not change. What will change is TRE 4.0’s own cut-off, which does not exist yet — this page deliberately does not predict it.

Where other pages get this wrong

BPSC TRE cut-offs are out of 120 marks, not 150.

Commonly published instead: Every competitor page reproduces the cut-off tables without stating the base at all, which leaves readers to assume 150 and conclude the exam is far easier than it is.

Part I (Language, 30 questions) is qualifying only and is excluded from merit. BPSC’s own notice, as reported in December 2023, says the merit list is prepared "excluding the marks of language, ie. the marks of the remaining 120 questions." A cut-off of 75 is therefore 62.5%, not 50%.

If you have been searching for BPSC TRE cut-off marks, you have found plenty of pages with tables on them. What you probably have not found is a page that tells you what the numbers are out of — and without that, the tables are close to meaningless.

The arithmetic that proves the 120 base

You do not have to take the notice on trust. The tables prove it themselves.

A published cut-off of 39 is impossible on a 150-mark base

  • The lowest number anywhere in the TRE 3.0 tables is 39.
  • BPSC’s minimum qualifying mark for SC and ST candidates is 32%.
  • 32% of 120 is 38.4 — so 39 is the smallest whole mark that clears the floor. It fits exactly.
  • 32% of 150 is 48 — so on a 150 base, a published SC cut-off of 39 would sit below BPSC’s own statutory floor. The Commission cannot publish a cut-off beneath its own qualifying minimum.
  • Those 39s are the fingerprint of a 120-mark base, and they recur across every level.

This check is ours. The underlying figures are aggregator transcriptions of BPSC result notices, not the notices themselves — see the note on sourcing below.

Minimum qualifying percentages — rules, not cut-offs

These two things get confused constantly. The qualifying percentage is a floor written into the rules that you must clear whatever else happens. The cut-off is where the last selected candidate actually landed in a given round, which depends on how many posts there were and how everyone scored. The cut-off is almost always well above the floor.

categoryminimumQualifyingPercentmarksOn120marksOn150IfMisappliedstatus
General / Unreserved (UR)40%4860confirmed via news report of BPSC notice
Backward Class (BC)36.5%43.8 (44)54.75confirmed via news report of BPSC notice
Extremely Backward Class (EBC)34% (one report) / 36.5% (another report) — SOURCES CONFLICT40.8 (41) or 43.8 (44)51 or 54.75disputed — see facts
Scheduled Caste (SC)32%38.4 (39)48confirmed via news report of BPSC notice
Scheduled Tribe (ST)32%38.4 (39)48confirmed via news report of BPSC notice
Women of all categories32%38.4 (39)48reported
Persons with Disability (PwD)32%38.4 (39)48reported

Unresolved: What is the EBC qualifying percentage?

  • One report of BPSC’s December 2023 notice groups BC and EBC together at 36.5%.
  • A separate Careers360 table gives EBC 34%.

Our position: We are not picking one. If you are an EBC candidate, plan against 36.5% — the higher of the two — because being wrong in that direction costs you nothing.

TRE 3.0 (2024) — the most recent published cut-offs

These are the numbers to reason from, because TRE 3.0 is the most recent completed round. All marks are out of 120.

Classes 11-12 (PGT) — language subjects

categoryHindiUrduEnglishSanskritBengaliMaithiliArabicPersianPaliPrakrit
UR887649816951625844NA
UR (Female)886449796850NA59NA57
EWS84674876NANANANANANA
EWS (Female)84594775NANANANANANA
SC53444155NANANANANANA
SC (Female)43494056NANANANANANA
ST50NANA49NANANANANANA
ST (Female)64NA46NANANANANANANA
EBC7771404250NANANANANA
EBC (Female)76553949NANANANANANA
BC83464452NANANANANANA
BC (Female)83444444NANANANANANA
BCL814039NANANANANANANA

Classes 11-12 (PGT) — science and social science subjects

categoryMathematicsPhysicsChemistryEconomicsGeographyPsychologySociologyPhilosophy
UR8340417371486657
UR (Female)6639397370486657
EWS63NANA7070NA61NA
EWS (Female)6339NA7059426146
SC39NANA5259403944
SC (Female)42NANA5252393953
STNANANANA56NANANA
ST (Female)NANANA51NA4244NA
EBC61NANA6268415442
EBC (Female)48NANA6267395439
BC69NANA6571426251
BC (Female)58NANA6570396145
BCL51NANA6268NA59NA

Classes 9-10 (TGT)

categoryHindiBengaliUrduSanskritArabicPersianEnglishScienceMathematicsSocial Science
UR877880645041617310283
UR (Female)86787357484760739275
EWS83NA7750NANA587010181
EWS (Female)82NA7253NANA58709174
SC39NA5640NANA39437669
SC (Female)41NANA42NANA39434263
ST54NANANANANA45445166
ST (Female)69NANANANANA43435067
EBC73567742NANA49639977
EBC (Female)73576939NANA49638572
BC83NA4644NANA587010281
BC (Female)83NA4639NANA57709074
BCL79NA63NANANA53678571
Disabled (VI)57NA58NANANA40477068
Disabled (DD)45NA4953NANA47607766
Disabled (OH)78NA6448NANA39609375
Disabled (MD)53NANANANANA45406455
Grandchild of Ex-Freedom Fighter46NANANANANA52405260

Classes 6-8 (middle school)

categorySocial ScienceMathematics and ScienceHindiEnglishSanskrit
Unreserved7592907577
Unreserved (Female)6882887175
EWS7188796758
EWS (Female)6475786451
SC5746393939
SC (Female)4839404040
ST5342474147
ST (Female)5341484268
EBC6885705642
EBC (Female)5965704839
BC7389816644
BC (Female)6375806139
BCL61717857NA
Disabled (VI)5752704039
Disabled (DD)5459544047
Disabled (OH)6476785246
Disabled (MD)45393944NA
Grandchild of Ex-Freedom Fighter39405346NA

Classes 1-5 (primary)

categoryGeneral (Education Dept)General (SC-ST Welfare Dept)Urdu (Education Dept)Bangla (Education Dept)
Unreserved81816882
Unreserved (Female)70705066
EWS747460NA
EWS (Female)63634350
SC39NA3947
SC (Female)39NANA44
ST39NANANA
ST (Female)39NANANA
EBC67665855
EBC (Female)56564448
BC74744168
BC (Female)66603950
BCL606039NA
Disabled (VI)53533971
Disabled (DD)555541NA
Disabled (OH)666641NA
Disabled (MD)39NANANA
Grandchild of Ex-Freedom Fighter39NANANA

The outliers — where the cut-offs went strange

The averages are less instructive than the extremes. These are the results that should change how you think about subject choice.

ranklevelsubjectcategorycutOffpercentOf120whyItMatters
Highest anywhereClass 9-10MathematicsUR10285.0%Also BC 102, EWS 101, EBC 99 — the entire top of the table sits above 99. A Class 9-10 maths aspirant needed near-perfection.
Highest, Class 6-8Class 6-8Mathematics and ScienceUnreserved9276.7%58,544 candidates for 5,623 posts, and only 63 posts went unfilled — a deep, high-scoring pool.
Highest, Class 11-12Class 11-12HindiUR8873.3%The most crowded PGT subject; UR and UR (Female) were identical at 88.
Highest, Class 1-5Class 1-5BanglaUnreserved8268.3%A tiny subject with a tiny number of posts — small-N subjects can cut high, not low.
Lowest at Class 11-12Class 11-12PhysicsUR4033.3%UR (Female) fell to 39. A PGT physics post went to candidates at roughly one third of the merit paper.
Lowest at Class 11-12 (2nd)Class 11-12ChemistryUR4134.2%UR (Female) 39. Same scarcity story as Physics.
Lowest at Class 9-10Class 9-10PersianUR4134.2%Minority-language subjects at Class 9-10 (Persian 41, Arabic 50) cut far below the mainstream subjects.
Biggest same-level spreadClass 11-12Hindi (88) vs English (49)UR39-mark gap73.3% vs 40.8%Two language subjects, same level, same paper structure, 39 marks apart. Subject choice moves the bar more than category does.
Level inversionClass 9-10 vs 11-12MathematicsUR102 (Cl 9-10) vs 83 (Cl 11-12)85.0% vs 69.2%A Class 9-10 maths post was 19 marks harder to win than a Class 11-12 maths post in the same round — the opposite of most candidates' assumption.
Floor effectClass 1-5General (Education Dept)SC / SC (Female) / ST / ST (Female)39 for all four32.5%39 is the lowest number that appears anywhere in the TRE 3.0 tables, and 39 = the smallest whole mark at or above 32% of 120. Reserved cut-offs at Class 1-5 hit the statutory floor, not a competitive level.

Four things these outliers tell you

  • Your subject matters more than your level. Class 9-10 Mathematics closed at 102 out of 120 — 85% — while Class 11-12 Physics closed at 40. Same round, same commission.
  • Level inversion is real. Class 9-10 Mathematics (102) was nineteen marks harder than Class 11-12 Mathematics (83). A "higher" level is not a harder one.
  • Cut-offs move violently between rounds. Class 11-12 Hindi went from 39 in TRE 1.0 to 88 in TRE 3.0. Any prediction built on one round is worthless.
  • Women’s cut-offs are not automatically lower. They are separate sub-list cut-offs, and they are sometimes higher: Class 9-10 Hindi ST was 54, ST women 69. Class 6-8 Sanskrit ST was 47, ST women 68.

Why a high candidate-to-post ratio does not mean a high cut-off

This is the most common reasoning error, and the TRE 3.0 data disproves it cleanly.

levelsubjectappearedvacanciesselectedpostsLeftUnfilledunreservedCutOff
Class 6-8Mathematics and Science58,5445,6235,5606392
Class 6-8Social Science65,9193,7893,789075
Class 6-8Hindi17,7162,8132,7991490
Class 6-8English11,0983,4942,87362175
Class 6-8Sanskrit3,0821,82694188577
Class 6-8Urdu3,3641,4281,027401not published in the source table
Class 6-8ALL SUBJECTS1,59,72318,97316,9891,984varies by subject
Class 1-5ALL SUBJECTS1,16,19325,50521,9113,59481 (General, Education Dept)

Class 6-8 Social Science had a higher candidate-to-post ratio than Mathematics and Science — 17.4 to 1 against 10.4 to 1 — and a lower cut-off, 75 against 92. Competition sets the floor; the score distribution sets the bar. A subject that attracts many weak candidates is not harder to crack than one that attracts fewer strong ones.

The Sanskrit result is stranger still and worth understanding. Class 6-8 Sanskrit left 885 of its 1,826 posts unfilled, yet the unreserved cut-off held at 77 while reserved cut-offs collapsed to the 39-42 range. Shortfalls do not lower the unreserved bar — they empty out the reserved sub-pools. If you are an unreserved candidate, an under-subscribed subject does not help you nearly as much as you would think.

TRE 1.0 (2023)

Where other pages get this wrong

The tables published across the internet as "TRE 2.0 cut-offs" are actually TRE 1.0.

Commonly published instead: Oliveboard, Physics Wallah and Career Power all label the same table set as TRE 2.0 or simply "2023".

The set contains no Class 6-8 table — and TRE 1.0 advertised zero Class 6-8 posts, while TRE 2.0 did include that level. Its subject coverage also matches the TRE 1.0 release of 25 October 2023. We label them TRE 1.0. We could find no genuine TRE 2.0 cut-off release, so we publish none rather than relabel these.

Classes 11-12 (PGT), unreserved, by subject

subjectunreservedCutOffoutOf
Hindi39120
Urdu42120
English61120
Sanskrit41120
Bengali65120
Maithili39120
Persian53120
Pali57120
Prakrit39120
Mathematics53120
Physics39120
Chemistry39120
Economics44120
Geography40120
Psychology39120
Sociology39120
Philosophy39120
Political Science39120
Home Science40120
Botany39120
Zoology57120
Accountancy65120
Business Studies61120
Entrepreneurship40120
History70120
Music39120
Magahi65120
Bhojpuri58120

We are publishing only the unreserved column for this level. The category-wise grid for TRE 1.0 Class 11-12 is reproduced inconsistently across sources — Physics Wallah heads it "(Female)" while Oliveboard gives the same values as its male column — and we are not going to pick one and present it as settled.

What this implies for TRE 4.0 — and what we will not tell you

We are not going to give you a predicted cut-off. Nobody can produce one honestly: the paper structure may change, the phase count is unresolved, and TRE 4.0 is the first round with a domicile condition, which alters the candidate pool in a way no past round can model. What we can give you is the basis to reason for yourself.

roundtotalPostsclass1to5class6to8class9to10class11to12share11to12status
TRE 1.0 (exam 19/20/26/27 Aug 2023)1,70,46179,9430 (level excluded entirely)32,91657,60233.8%reported (news)
TRE 2.0 (exam 7-15 Dec 2023, Advt. 27/2023)1,22,286not reliably sourcednot reliably sourcednot reliably sourcednot reliably sourcednot reliably sourcedreported (total only) — level split omitted, see doNotClaim
TRE 3.0 (exam Mar & Jul 2024)87,774 as advertised25,505 (figure used at result stage)18,973 (figure used at result stage)nearly 17,000over 22,000approx. 25%reported (news)
TRE 4.0 (Advt. 14/2026, 18 Aug 2026)32,3883,8478,5633,87716,10149.7%confirmed (official advertisement)

The composition shift is the real story

  • Total posts have fallen round on round: 1,70,461 → 1,22,286 → 87,774 → 32,388. TRE 4.0 is under a fifth the size of TRE 1.0.
  • Classes 11-12 was 33.8% of TRE 1.0 and roughly 25% of TRE 3.0. In TRE 4.0 it is 49.7% — very nearly half of all posts.
  • Classes 1-5 has collapsed from 79,943 posts to 3,847.
  • So this is not simply "a smaller TRE". It is a differently shaped one, and a primary-level candidate faces a far harsher round than the headline reduction suggests.

Fewer posts generally push cut-offs up, but the direction is not guaranteed — the domicile condition may shrink the applicant pool at the same time. Two large effects pulling opposite ways is exactly the situation in which a confident prediction is worth nothing.

One published figure we cannot explain

In the TRE 3.0 Class 11-12 tables, Physics closes at 40 out of 120 for unreserved candidates — 33.3%, which is below BPSC’s own 40% unreserved floor. No source we found explains it. A relaxation in a subject with a severe shortfall of qualified candidates is the obvious hypothesis, but we have nothing supporting it, so we are recording the anomaly rather than resolving it. If you are relying on that specific number, verify it against the result notice.

Are BPSC TRE cut-off marks out of 150 or 120?

Out of 120. The paper is 150 marks, but Part I (Language, 30 questions) is qualifying only at 30% and is excluded from the merit list. BPSC’s notice states the merit list is prepared on the remaining 120 questions. A cut-off of 75 therefore means 62.5%, not 50%.

What was the highest BPSC TRE cut-off ever published?

Class 9-10 Mathematics in TRE 3.0, at 102 out of 120 for unreserved candidates — 85%. Backward Class also closed at 102, EWS at 101 and EBC at 99.

What was the lowest BPSC TRE cut-off?

Class 11-12 Physics at 40 out of 120 for unreserved candidates in TRE 3.0, with Chemistry at 41. Both were 39 for unreserved women. The Physics figure sits below BPSC’s own 40% unreserved qualifying floor and no source explains why.

What is the minimum qualifying percentage for BPSC TRE?

As announced in December 2023: 40% unreserved, 36.5% Backward Class, 32% for SC, ST, SC/ST women and persons with disability, applied to the 120-mark merit base. The EBC figure is disputed — one report groups it with BC at 36.5%, another gives 34%.

Will the BPSC TRE 4.0 cut-off be higher or lower?

We will not predict it, and you should be sceptical of pages that do. Posts have fallen to 32,388 from 87,774, which generally pushes cut-offs up — but TRE 4.0 is also the first round with a domicile condition, which may shrink the applicant pool and pull the other way. Two large effects in opposite directions make any specific number guesswork.

Are women’s cut-offs always lower in BPSC TRE?

No. They are separate sub-list cut-offs and are sometimes higher than the corresponding category cut-off. In TRE 3.0, Class 9-10 Hindi closed at 54 for ST and 69 for ST women; Class 6-8 Sanskrit closed at 47 for ST and 68 for ST women.

Does a subject with unfilled posts have a lower cut-off?

Not for unreserved candidates. Class 6-8 Sanskrit left 885 of 1,826 posts unfilled in TRE 3.0, yet the unreserved cut-off held at 77 while reserved cut-offs fell to 39-42. Shortfalls empty the reserved sub-pools rather than lowering the unreserved bar.

Where can I find the official BPSC TRE cut-off PDF?

On bpsc.bih.nic.in, in the result notices — the TRE 3.0 Class 1-5 and 6-8 notice of 15 November 2024, and the Class 11-12 notice of 6 March 2025. We recommend checking the figures on this page against those annexures: every number here is an aggregator transcription, not a reading of the original document.

Sources

official = a BPSC or Bihar Government document. reported = a news or coaching site's transcription, which we could not check against the original. Where sources disagree this page says so rather than picking a winner.