Updated : 14 hours ago
View Complete ArticleChecked 22 September 2026. The domicile policy was a cabinet decision under the previous Chief Minister. Whether it was carried into Advertisement 14/2026 unchanged is the key unverified point — check the advertisement itself.
Where other pages get this wrong
The 84.4% / 15.6% domicile split has no order behind it.
Commonly published instead: Adda247 and several Hindi-language aggregators publish "84.4% for Bihar domicile, 15.6% open to all" as though it were a rule.
Searching those exact figures returns only aggregator pages — no Bihar government order, no cabinet resolution, no gazette, no BPSC notice. The real decision is the Bihar Cabinet’s approval on 5 August 2025 of 85% of school teacher posts for native residents. The 84.4 figure appears to be that 85% restated with invented decimal precision.
We also tested the obvious defence of the 84.4 figure — that it might be the sum of the vertical reservation categories. It is not. Bihar’s vertical total in force is 60%: SC 16, ST 1, EBC 18, BC 12, BC-women 3, plus EWS 10, leaving 40% unreserved. No arithmetic on any published Bihar percentage set produces 84.4 or 15.6.
| Date | Decision | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 8 July 2025 | Cabinet restricts the existing 35% women’s horizontal reservation to permanent residents of Bihar | Official — reported by Prasar Bharati |
| 4 August 2025 | Chief Minister Nitish Kumar directs the Education Department to amend rules to prioritise Bihar residents, stating it applies from TRE-4 and TRE-5 | Reported — a direction to amend, not itself an amendment |
| 5 August 2025 | Cabinet approves 85% of school teacher posts for native residents of Bihar | Reported |
Where other pages get this wrong
TRE 3.0 was not domicile-restricted. TRE 4.0 is the first round with any domicile condition.
Commonly published instead: Several pages state that TRE 3.0 introduced a Bihar-domicile requirement and that TRE 4.0 continues it.
The chronology makes that impossible. TRE 3.0 registration closed in February 2024 and the exam ran from 7 March 2024 — seventeen months before the cabinet decisions of July and August 2025. TRE 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 all predate the policy entirely.
Reportedly yes. Other-state candidates can apply, receive no state reservation benefit, and are treated as general category — so a reserved-category candidate from outside Bihar competes against the unreserved cut-off, which is generally the highest one.
Reconciling that with the 85% policy, the coherent reading is that the 85% reserves a share of the vacancy pool rather than barring anyone from the form. We flag that as a reading, not a rule. If you are applying from outside Bihar, this is the single most important thing to confirm in the advertisement before you pay a fee.
| Category | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Scheduled Caste (SC) | 16% |
| Scheduled Tribe (ST) | 1% |
| Extremely Backward Class (EBC) | 18% |
| Backward Class (BC) | 12% |
| Backward Class women | 3% |
| Economically Weaker Section (EWS) | 10% |
| Unreserved | 40% |
Where other pages get this wrong
The 65% and 78% reservation figures were struck down by the Patna High Court on 20 June 2024.
Commonly published instead: One large exam portal still publishes SC 20 / ST 2 / EBC 25 / BC 18 / BC-women 3 / EWS 10 — totalling 78% — as the live scheme, with no mention of the judgment.
Bihar’s 2023 Act raised caste-based reservation to 65%, and 75% with EWS. The Patna High Court struck those enhancements down. Candidates computing their competitive pool from the 78% table are working from percentages that are no longer in force.
One further point, consequential for married women and thinly sourced: it is reported that for Bihar’s women’s quota, the father’s domicile and caste determine eligibility — meaning marriage into Bihar would not create entitlement and marriage out of Bihar would not destroy it. We could not verify this against a General Administration Department resolution, so we are flagging it rather than stating it. If it applies to you, it is worth confirming directly.
The residence certificate is issued through Bihar’s Right to Public Services portal at serviceonline.bihar.gov.in. We are not stating a validity period: the figures circulating for this are unsourced, and the pages that would have settled it were unreadable. Apply early rather than assuming an existing certificate is still current.
There is no government order containing that figure. Searching for it returns only aggregator pages. The actual decision is the Bihar Cabinet’s approval on 5 August 2025 of 85% of school teacher posts for native residents. The 84.4 figure appears to be that 85% restated with false precision.
Reportedly yes, without any state reservation benefit — an out-of-state candidate is treated as general category, so a reserved-category candidate from another state competes against the unreserved cut-off. Given the 85% residence policy, confirm this in the advertisement before paying a fee.
No. TRE 3.0 closed registration in February 2024, seventeen months before the cabinet decisions of July and August 2025 that created the residence policy. TRE 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 all predate it. TRE 4.0 is the first round with any domicile condition.
No. The Bihar Cabinet restricted the 35% women’s horizontal reservation to permanent residents of Bihar on 8 July 2025.
The scheme in force totals 60%: SC 16%, ST 1%, EBC 18%, BC 12%, BC-women 3%, plus EWS 10%, leaving 40% unreserved. The higher 65% and 78% figures still published on some sites come from the 2023 Act, whose enhancements the Patna High Court struck down on 20 June 2024.
Through the Right to Public Services portal at serviceonline.bihar.gov.in. We are not quoting a validity period because we could not source one — apply early rather than assuming an older certificate is still valid.
We could not find a sourced percentage for ex-servicemen or sports quotas in Bihar teacher recruitment, so we do not publish one. Any figure you see elsewhere is worth asking for a source for.
It is reported that the father’s domicile and caste govern eligibility for Bihar’s women’s quota, which would mean marriage neither creates nor removes entitlement. We could not verify this against a government resolution, so treat it as unconfirmed and check directly if it affects you.
official = a BPSC or Bihar Government document. reported = a news or coaching site's transcription, which we could not check against the original. Where sources disagree this page says so rather than picking a winner.
Every page in this series carries a "checked on" date and stamps each source as official or reported. If you find something here that is wrong, it is worth telling us — these pages are rebuilt from one file, so a correction fixes it everywhere at once.