Outcomes of Democracy — Class 10 Social Science
Political Science — Democratic Politics-II · Chapter 5
CBSE Class 10 community
View all
4- History
- Economics
- + 2 more
12- Mathematics
- Science
- + 10 more
2- First Flight
- Footprints without Feet
- 70+ formulas and theorems
- Board-paper chapter counts
- 24 traps corrected
- Equations and formulas
- Book tables as charts
- Traps corrected
- 15 पाठ
- व्याकरण
- लेखन प्रारूप
- HTML & CSS examples
- Protocol tables
- Cyber ethics
- 17 पाठ
- व्याकरण
- लेखन प्रारूप
- 9 पाठ
- सन्धि-समास
- प्रत्यय
Chapter summary
Key ideas & terms
- Accountability
- The duty of a government to answer to the people for its decisions and actions.
- Legitimate government
- A government accepted by the people as rightful and lawful.
- Transparency
- Openness in decision-making that lets citizens examine the process.
- Economic inequality
- The unequal distribution of income and wealth among people.
- Dignity
- The respect and equal worth that democracy guarantees to citizens.
- Accommodation
- Settling differences among groups through negotiation and power-sharing.
- Responsiveness
- The readiness of a government to attend to people’s needs and demands.
- Political equality
- Equal political rights and one value for every citizen’s vote.
Extra questions & answers
Why is democracy considered a better form of government?
It is accountable, responsive and legitimate, lets citizens participate and question rulers, and provides peaceful, lawful ways to resolve conflicts.
How does democracy accommodate social diversity?
It allows different groups to express their views and negotiate, sharing power and respecting differences, which reduces the chance of violent conflict.
Does democracy guarantee economic development and reduce inequality?
It does not always produce faster growth than dictatorships and has not removed economic inequality, but it provides a more legitimate, accountable framework for addressing them.
How does democracy promote the dignity of citizens?
By ensuring political equality, giving weaker sections and women a voice, and treating all citizens as equals with the right to be heard.
Why are complaints about democracy a sign of its success?
Because they show that people expect democracy to deliver and judge it by high standards, which itself reflects the spread of democratic values.
Why is democracy considered a better form of government?
It is accountable, responsive and legitimate, lets citizens participate and question rulers, and provides peaceful, lawful ways to resolve conflicts.
How does democracy accommodate social diversity?
It allows different groups to express their views and negotiate, sharing power and respecting differences, which reduces the chance of violent conflict.
Does democracy guarantee economic development and remove inequality?
It does not always produce faster growth than dictatorships and has not removed economic inequality, but it provides a more legitimate and accountable framework to address them.
How does democracy promote the dignity of citizens?
By ensuring political equality, giving weaker sections and women a voice, and treating all citizens as equals with the right to be heard.
Why are people’s complaints about democracy a sign of its success?
Because they show that people expect democracy to deliver and judge it by high standards, which itself reflects the spread of democratic values.
Exercises
1. How does democracy produce an accountable, responsive and legitimate government?
Democracy produces an accountable government by giving citizens the right to elect their representatives and remove them through regular, free and fair elections. Elected rulers must follow established laws and procedures, explain their decisions and remain answerable to the people. Democracy produces a responsive government because public opinion, debate, opposition parties, the media and citizens’ participation pressure rulers to consider people’s needs and demands. It produces a legitimate government because it is formed by representatives chosen by the people and therefore enjoys their consent and support, even though its decisions may sometimes be slow or imperfect.
2. What are the conditions under which democracies accommodate social diversities?
Democracies accommodate social diversities when the majority works with minorities and respects their interests instead of imposing its will upon them. Majority and minority groups must not be treated as permanent divisions, because different persons and groups should have the opportunity to form a majority at different times. Majority rule must also not become the rule of one religious, racial, linguistic or social community. Every citizen and group must receive equal rights, representation and a fair chance to participate in public life.
3. Give arguments to support or oppose the following assertions:
• Industrialised countries can afford democracy but the poor need dictatorship to become rich.
I oppose this assertion. Democracy is not a luxury reserved for industrialised countries. Poor people also need political rights, dignity, accountability and participation in decisions that affect their lives. The chapter’s evidence shows that dictatorships have only a slightly higher average growth rate, while the difference between poor democracies and poor dictatorships is negligible. Economic development depends on many factors besides the form of government. Therefore, dictatorship is neither necessary nor a guarantee for becoming rich.
3. Give arguments to support or oppose the following assertions:
• Democracy can’t reduce inequality of incomes between different citizens.
This assertion is partly supported by the actual record of democracies, but it is too absolute. Democracies have often failed to reduce income inequality, and in many democratic countries a small wealthy section receives a very large share of national income. However, democracy creates peaceful and constitutional methods through which disadvantaged citizens can organise, vote, demand welfare policies and hold governments accountable. It therefore has the capacity to reduce inequality, even though this result is not automatic and depends on public action and effective policies.
3. Give arguments to support or oppose the following assertions:
• Government in poor countries should spend less on poverty reduction, health, education and spend more on industries and infrastructure.
I oppose this assertion. Industries and infrastructure are important for growth, but reducing expenditure on poverty alleviation, health and education would deny poor citizens their basic needs and weaken their ability to participate in development. Healthy and educated people are more productive and better able to find employment. A balanced policy should invest in industries and infrastructure while also providing food security, healthcare, education, housing and livelihood support so that the benefits of growth are shared widely.
3. Give arguments to support or oppose the following assertions:
• In democracy all citizens have one vote, which means that there is absence of any domination and conflict.
I oppose this assertion. One person, one vote establishes political equality, but it does not automatically remove social domination, economic inequality or conflict. Differences based on caste, religion, language, gender and wealth may continue in democratic societies. Democracy provides institutions and procedures for expressing, negotiating and resolving such conflicts peacefully. It can reduce domination by protecting equal rights, but citizens and governments must continually work to make equality real in everyday life.
4. Identify the challenges to democracy in the following descriptions. Also suggest policy/institutional mechanism to deepen democracy in the given situations:
• Following a High Court directive, a temple in Orissa that had separate entry doors for dalits and non-dalits allowed entry for all from the same door.
The challenge is caste-based discrimination and the denial of equal dignity to Dalits. Allowing everyone to enter through the same door is an important step, but deeper democracy requires strict enforcement of laws against untouchability and discrimination, local monitoring committees, accessible complaint mechanisms, penalties for offenders and public awareness programmes promoting equal treatment in all religious and public places.
4. Identify the challenges to democracy in the following descriptions. Also suggest policy/institutional mechanism to deepen democracy in the given situations:
• A large number of farmers are committing suicide in different states of India.
The challenge is the government’s inadequate response to rural distress, debt, crop failure, unstable prices and lack of livelihood security. Democracy can be deepened through affordable institutional credit, effective crop insurance, fair minimum support prices, timely compensation for losses, improved irrigation and agricultural services, regulation of exploitative lending, accessible counselling and grievance-redress systems, and direct participation of farmers’ organisations in agricultural policymaking.
4. Identify the challenges to democracy in the following descriptions. Also suggest policy/institutional mechanism to deepen democracy in the given situations:
• Following an allegation of killing of three civilians in Gandwara in a fake encounter by Jammu and Kashmir police, an enquiry has been ordered.
The challenge is possible misuse of state power, violation of the right to life and lack of accountability in the security system. An enquiry is necessary, but it should be independent, impartial, transparent and completed within a fixed time. Evidence and witnesses must be protected, the findings should be made public, guilty officials should be prosecuted through due process, victims’ families should receive justice and compensation, and stronger civilian oversight and human-rights safeguards should be established.
5. In the context of democracies, which of the following ideas is correct– democracies have successfully eliminated:
A. conflicts among people
B. economic inequalities among people
C. differences of opinion about how marginalised sections
are to be treated
D. the idea of political inequality
D. the idea of political inequality. Democracy is based on the principle that all adult citizens have equal political status and an equal vote. It has not completely eliminated social conflicts, economic inequalities or differences of opinion.
6. In the context of assessing democracy, which among the following is the odd one out. Democracies need to ensure:
A. free and fair elections
B. dignity of the individual
C. majority rule
D. equal treatment before law
C. majority rule. Democracy requires majority decision-making, but not the unrestricted rule of a permanent majority community. The majority must respect minority rights and work within constitutional limits. The other options are essential democratic outcomes or principles.
7. Studies on political and social inequalities in democracy show that:
A. democracy and development go together.
B. inequalities exist in democracies.
C. inequalities do not exist under dictatorship.
D. dictatorship is better than democracy.
B. inequalities exist in democracies. Political equality through voting does not automatically remove economic and social inequalities, which may remain severe even under democratic governments.
8. Read the passage below:
Nannu is a daily wage earner. He lives in Welcome Mazdoor
Colony, a slum habitation in East Delhi. He lost his ration card
and applied for a duplicate one in January 2004. He made
several rounds to the local Food and Civil Supplies office for
the next three months. But the clerks and officials would
not even look at him, leave alone do his job or bother to
tell him the status of his application. Ultimately, he filed an
application under the Right to Information Act asking for the
daily progress made on his application, names of the officials,
who were supposed to act on his application and what action
would be taken against these officials for their inaction. Within
a week of filing application under the Right to Information Act,
he was visited by an inspector from the Food Department,
who informed him that the card had been made and he could
collect it from the office. When Nannu went to collect his card
next day, he was given a very warm treatment by the Food
and Supply Officer (FSO), who is the head of a Circle. The FSO
offered him tea and requested him to withdraw his application
under the Right to Information, since his work had already
been done.
What does Nannu’s example show? What impact did Nannu’s
action have on officials? Ask your parents their experiences
when they approach government officials to attend to their
problems.
Nannu’s example shows that the Right to Information can make government functioning more transparent and accountable. Although officials had ignored his application for months, his RTI request forced them to reveal who was responsible, explain the delay and face possible action for inaction. As a result, they processed his ration card quickly and began treating him respectfully. Experiences of citizens approaching government offices can vary: some officials are helpful, while in other cases people may face delays, repeated visits, unclear procedures or indifference. Written applications, receipts, grievance portals and the RTI Act can help citizens demand timely action and hold officials responsible.