Checked 31 October 2026. Format from SILE’s Part A page and 2027 Session 1 application guide; statute text from Singapore Statutes Online, read 31 October 2026. Statutes are amended; check the current text before relying on a section. Independent — not affiliated with SILE.
For 2027 Session 1, each Part A paper is 60 multiple-choice questions in two hours, open book. That is two minutes a question across Company Law, Criminal Law, Evidence Law, Land Law and Singapore Legal System. Below are three Evidence Law questions from the free sample of our Evidence Law practice test, written by us from the Evidence Act 1893, each with the answer and the sections behind it.
Independent — not affiliated with SILE (the Singapore Institute of Legal Education) or the Ministry of Law. The exam facts on this page come from SILE’s own web pages and its 2027 Session 1 application guide, read on 31 October 2026 and listed at the end. Our practice questions are written by us from Singapore legislation; they are not SILE questions.
Format: SILE, Guide to Application Process, 2027 Part A Session 1, Section G. The 2 minutes is our arithmetic.
FreeTests: Hearsay and s 32 exceptions · Exclusion of oral by documentary evidence · Examination of witnesses · Interpretation and presumptions
Singapore Bar Part A Evidence Law: free sample
Answer 4 questions against the clock, like the real exam. You then see the right answer, the reason and your time on each. About 8 minutes · free · no sign-in.
4 questions to answer
Start nowabout 8 minThis one is free · no sign-in needed
Your result shows how long each question took you.
What SILE says about the format
SILE’s Part A page says all examinable papers use the open-book format, and its 2027 Session 1 guide lists each of the five papers as 60 MCQs from 2.30pm to 4.30pm. The papers are e-exams taken at the Singapore Institute of Management on your own laptop, which must have a working webcam and microphone; SILE says a macOS or Windows 10/11 laptop bought in the last 2 to 3 years with at least 8 GB RAM should be suitable, and Windows laptops must not use an ARM processor. Course materials, including the syllabus, learning plan and reading materials, are given to accepted candidates through SILE Campus.
We found no past papers or official sample questions on SILE’s public pages, and SILE’s website terms exclude commercial exploitation of its content without prior written consent, so you will not find real Part A questions here or in our practice test. What you can practise is applying a statute or a rule to a short set of facts and choosing between options that look close, which is how our questions are built.
| Day | Date | Paper | Time | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monday | 19 April 2027 | Company Law | 2.30pm to 4.30pm | 60 MCQs, open book |
| Tuesday | 20 April 2027 | Criminal Law | 2.30pm to 4.30pm | 60 MCQs, open book |
| Wednesday | 21 April 2027 | Evidence Law | 2.30pm to 4.30pm | 60 MCQs, open book |
| Thursday | 22 April 2027 | Land Law | 2.30pm to 4.30pm | 60 MCQs, open book |
| Friday | 23 April 2027 | Singapore Legal System | 2.30pm to 4.30pm | 60 MCQs, open book |
2027 Session 1, from SILE’s application guide (Section G). Dates are subject to change; SILE asks candidates to keep 26 to 30 April 2027 free as reserve dates.
Three worked Evidence Law questions
These are three of the four free questions in our Evidence Law practice test, printed exactly as the player shows them, with the explanation you see after answering. Each is written by us from the Evidence Act 1893. Try each one before you read the answer.
Question 1 · Evidence Law · Interpretation and presumptions
Suppose a provision of the Evidence Act declares fact X to be conclusive proof of fact Y. At a trial in the High Court, fact X is duly proved. Opposing counsel then seeks to call a witness whose evidence is aimed solely at showing that fact Y never occurred. How should the court deal with the application?
- Refuse it, since evidence may not be given to disprove fact Y.
- Allow it, and simply give the witness's evidence less weight.
- Allow it, but first call for further proof of fact Y from the other side.
- Allow it, since fact Y is regarded as proved only until disproved.
Answer: A. Under s 4(3), once the one fact is proved the court must regard the other as proved, and it "is not to allow evidence to be given for the purpose of disproving it". Conclusive proof therefore shuts out any evidence offered only to disprove fact Y, and the court should refuse the application. The option treating fact Y as proved only until disproved confuses conclusive proof with a mandatory presumption under s 4(2), where the fact stands only "unless and until it is disproved"; that rebuttal route is precisely what s 4(3) removes.
Source: Evidence Act 1893, section 4(2) and (3)
One of the free questions in the ProSyllabus Evidence Law practice test, written by us from the Evidence Act 1893; not a SILE question.
Question 2 · Evidence Law · Hearsay and s 32 exceptions
Lim Brothers Pte Ltd sues a rival for passing off, alleging that the rival's new kaya jars look confusingly like its own. A supermarket manager in Bedok will testify that on the launch weekend several shoppers picked up the rival's jars and said to one another, 'Eh, this is the Lim Brothers one.' The shoppers were never identified. Which provision most aptly makes their remarks relevant?
- Section 32A, because a verbal utterance may be treated as stating any fact it implies
- Section 32(1)(h), as statements by a number of persons expressing their impressions
- Section 32(1)(j)(ii), as statements of persons who cannot be found despite reasonable efforts
- Section 32(1)(d), as opinions on a matter of general interest made before the controversy
Answer: B. Section 32(1)(h) applies when a statement was "made by a number of persons and expressed feelings or impressions on their part relevant to the matter in question". The shoppers' shared reaction is an impression directly relevant to whether the get-up causes confusion. Paragraph (j)(ii) would require proof that reasonable efforts were made to locate them, which is absent. Section 32A is not a free-standing head of relevance: it operates only "for the purposes of section 32(1)" and so still needs a paragraph such as (h).
Source: Evidence Act 1893, sections 32(1)(h), 32(1)(j)(ii) and 32A
One of the free questions in the ProSyllabus Evidence Law practice test, written by us from the Evidence Act 1893; not a SILE question.
Question 3 · Evidence Law · Exclusion of oral by documentary evidence
By a written agreement, Mr Rahman agrees to sell 'my condominium unit at Tampines' to Ms Lim for $1.1 million. Mr Rahman in fact owns two condominium units at Tampines. Can evidence be given of facts showing which unit was meant?
- Yes, because s 97 allows evidence that a word was used in a peculiar sense.
- No, because s 96 bars evidence where the language is plain in itself.
- Yes, because the words could fit either unit but only one was meant.
- No, because s 95 bars evidence to explain an ambiguous document.
Answer: C. Section 98 applies where the language "might have been meant to apply to any one, and could not have been meant to apply to more than one of several persons" or things. The words fit either Tampines unit, but only one can have been sold, so evidence may be given to show which was intended. Section 95 is the wrong provision: it covers language ambiguous or defective on its face, whereas these words are clear and the doubt arises only from the facts. Section 96 applies where the words fit the facts accurately, and s 97 where they are meaningless in relation to them.
Source: Evidence Act 1893, sections 95 to 98
One of the free questions in the ProSyllabus Evidence Law practice test, written by us from the Evidence Act 1893; not a SILE question.
| Question | Paper | Answer | Statute |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evidence Law · Interpretation and presumptions | A: Refuse it, since evidence may not be given to disprove fact Y. | Evidence Act 1893, section 4(2) and (3) |
| 2 | Evidence Law · Hearsay and s 32 exceptions | B: Section 32(1)(h), as statements by a number of persons expressing their impressions | Evidence Act 1893, sections 32(1)(h), 32(1)(j)(ii) and 32A |
| 3 | Evidence Law · Exclusion of oral by documentary evidence | C: Yes, because the words could fit either unit but only one was meant. | Evidence Act 1893, sections 95 to 98 |
The table repeats the three answers for readers on a version of this page that does not show the cards.
Try a full Evidence Law paper
Three questions show the approach, and the fourth free question is in the test itself. Sixty in two hours shows whether you can keep the pace. The ProSyllabus Part A Evidence Law practice test has two full Evidence Law mocks of 60 questions each on applied scenarios under the Evidence Act 1893, with every answer citing the section it turns on and your score by topic. Each mock runs on a 2-hour timer, like the real paper, and you can try a few questions free first. Our questions are written from Singapore legislation and are not SILE questions.
FreeTests: Hearsay and s 32 exceptions · Exclusion of oral by documentary evidence · Examination of witnesses · Interpretation and presumptions
Singapore Bar Part A Evidence Law: free sample
Answer 4 questions against the clock, like the real exam. You then see the right answer, the reason and your time on each. About 8 minutes · free · no sign-in.
4 questions to answer
Start nowabout 8 minThis one is free · no sign-in needed
Your result shows how long each question took you.
What the three questions have in common
Each one turns on the exact words of a section, and the wrong options are neighbouring provisions that sound right. Question 1 turns on the difference between conclusive proof in section 4(3), which shuts out evidence offered only to disprove the fact, and a presumption under section 4(2), which stands only until disproved. Question 2 needs the right paragraph of section 32(1): statements by a number of persons expressing their impressions fall under paragraph (h), while section 32A works only through section 32(1) and is not a head of relevance on its own. Question 3 asks you to tell apart four sections that sit side by side, sections 95 to 98, on when evidence may explain the words of a document.
That is a trap to watch for if you studied in the UK, Australia, New Zealand or the US: your instinct comes from your own jurisdiction’s rules, and Singapore’s statute may say something different. Open book helps only if you know which section to open.
Pacing at two minutes a question
| Time into the paper | Aim to have answered | If you are behind |
|---|---|---|
| 30 minutes | 15 questions | Answer, flag and move on; stop looking up what you half-know |
| 60 minutes | 30 questions | Look up only questions that turn on a section number or test |
| 90 minutes | 45 questions | Answer the rest from your first reading; come back only if time is left |
| 110 minutes | 60 questions | Deal with any unanswered questions as the examination instructions allow |
| 110–120 minutes | Review flagged questions | — |
Our pacing plan, not SILE guidance: 60 questions in 110 minutes leaves 10 minutes to review. We found no statement in the sources we read on whether wrong answers lose marks; check the examination instructions SILE issues before deciding how to treat questions you are unsure of.
Our pacing plan for one 60-question, 120-minute paper.
Building Part A notes for an open-book exam
Open-book notes are not a summary to read; they are a map to find things in seconds. In 2027 Session 1 the papers come one a day for five days, so five separate, slim sets you can work from under time pressure make sense. (The sixth compulsory subject, Ethics, requires you to complete SILE’s online Ethics and Professional Responsibility module and score 100% on its online quiz, with unlimited attempts, before you may sit the papers.)
What good open-book notes look like
- One index per paper, ordered the way the syllabus on SILE Campus is ordered, with the statute section and page in your materials for each topic.
- The tests and lists that questions turn on written out in full: exceptions, time limits, numbers of years, who must prove what.
- Tabs on the statutes you use most, so you open the right section first time.
- A short list of the rules that differ from your own jurisdiction, because those are where you will pick a plausible wrong option.
- Nothing you have not used in a timed practice paper: if you never look something up under time, it is clutter.
Our suggestions, not SILE guidance.
Test your notes the way you will use them. Sit a full practice paper on the timer with only your notes and materials, then check which questions you looked up and how long each look-up took. Anything over a minute is a sign your index is not specific enough.
Evidence Law practice test
Every question in our practice test is written from the Evidence Act 1893 and explained with the section behind the answer, like the three above. The ProSyllabus Part A Evidence Law practice test has two full Evidence Law mocks of 60 questions each on applied scenarios under the Evidence Act 1893, with every answer citing the section it turns on and your score by topic. Each mock runs on a 2-hour timer, like the real paper, and you can try a few questions free first. Our questions are written from Singapore legislation and are not SILE questions.
FreeTests: Hearsay and s 32 exceptions · Exclusion of oral by documentary evidence · Examination of witnesses · Interpretation and presumptions
Singapore Bar Part A Evidence Law: free sample
Answer 4 questions against the clock, like the real exam. You then see the right answer, the reason and your time on each. About 8 minutes · free · no sign-in.
4 questions to answer
Start nowabout 8 minThis one is free · no sign-in needed
Your result shows how long each question took you.
Frequently asked questions
How many questions are in a Part A paper?
For 2027 Session 1, 60 multiple-choice questions, sat in two hours (2.30pm to 4.30pm), per SILE’s application guide. Check the guide for your own session.
Are Part A past papers available?
We found no past papers or official sample questions on SILE’s public pages. Course materials go to accepted candidates through SILE Campus.
Are these sample questions from SILE?
No. They are free questions from the ProSyllabus Evidence Law practice test, written by us from the Evidence Act 1893 on Singapore Statutes Online.
How long do I have per question?
Two minutes on average: 120 minutes for 60 questions. We suggest answering all 60 within 110 minutes to leave time to review.
Is Part A open book?
Yes. SILE says all examinable papers use the open-book format.
Independent — not affiliated with SILE (the Singapore Institute of Legal Education) or the Ministry of Law. The exam facts on this page come from SILE’s own web pages and its 2027 Session 1 application guide, read on 31 October 2026 and listed at the end. Our practice questions are written by us from Singapore legislation; they are not SILE questions.
More in this series
- Part A Singapore Bar Exam 2027: papers, format, dates and fees
- Singapore Bar Exam explained: Part A vs Part B, who takes which and in what order
- How to become a lawyer in Singapore with an overseas degree, step by step
- Singapore Bar Exam for foreign lawyers: Part A, exemptions and the FPE
- Singapore Bar Exam cost 2027: Part A, Part B and retake fees
Sources
- official — SILE: Part A of the Singapore Bar Examinations
- official — SILE: Guide to Application Process, 2027 Part A Session 1 Examinations and Optional Course (1 September 2026, PDF)
- official — SILE notice: Mandatory Ethics and Professional Responsibility online module for Part A candidates
- official — Singapore Statutes Online: Evidence Act 1893
official = a document published by the conducting body. reported = a news or coaching site we could not check against an original. Where sources disagree this page says so rather than picking one.
