Checked 28 September 2026. From the official GATE MN question papers and final answer keys 2023–2026 and the GATE 2027 brochure. Subject classification, type counts and the repeat-topic list are ours.
We went through all 260 questions of the four most recent official GATE Mining papers (2023–2026) with their final answer keys and classified each by subject and question type. Two findings shape how to prepare. First, MN is a numerical paper: 48 to 56 of the 85 subject marks each year were numerical-answer (NAT) questions, which have no negative marking and no options to guess from. Second, the numericals repeat: continuous-miner cycles, longwall output, Mohr-Coulomb, natural ventilation pressure, NPV, cut-off grade, queuing and blast design come back almost every year. The official papers and keys are linked at the end of this guide.
Official MN papers and final keys; our count.
The paper format
| Item | GATE MN |
|---|---|
| Questions / marks / time | 65 questions, 100 marks, 3 hours |
| General Aptitude | 10 questions, 15 marks |
| Subject (incl. Engineering Mathematics) | 55 questions, 85 marks |
| MCQ penalty | −1/3 for a 1-mark, −2/3 for a 2-mark question |
| MSQ and NAT | No negative marking and no partial credit |
| Sessions | One session every year 2023–2026, so marks are not normalised |
| Second paper | Not allowed with MN in 2027 |
GATE 2027 brochure; official MN keys 2023–2026; 2027 two-paper combination table.
Question types, year by year
Our count from the official final keys. MSQs: 2025 Q42 (dragline) and 2026 Q29 (Fourier series).
The numbers change how you should practise. Between 56% and 66% of subject marks were NAT (48 to 56 of 85), so a formula remembered exactly, and arithmetic done carefully, is worth more than recognising the right option. The MCQs carry the risk: with 27–36 MCQ marks a year, a habit of guessing costs marks that the NATs cannot return. Use the calculator to see what your own mock-test guessing costs.
MN is a numerical paper: how much are MCQ guesses costing you?
Enter your mock-test numbers. MCQs carry negative marks; NAT and MSQ answers do not — and there is no partial credit.
GATE 2027 brochure: MCQ penalty −1/3 (1-mark) and −2/3 (2-mark); no negative and no partial marks for MSQ and NAT. Counts include General Aptitude. In 2023–2026, 48–56 of MN’s 85 subject marks were NAT (our count from the official keys).
A worked example shows the size of the effect. A candidate who attempts 14 one-mark and 8 two-mark MCQs and gets 4 and 3 of them wrong loses about 3.3 marks to penalties (4 × 1/3 + 3 × 2/3). By the 2026 score formula that is about 47 score points (3.33 × 550 ÷ (68.33 − 29.5)), and in the 2026 marks distribution the 30–40 band held about 66 candidates per mark — so roughly 200 ranks (our arithmetic from the GATE 2026 statistical report). Leaving the three least-sure questions blank usually costs less than guessing them.
Subject weightage, 2023–2026
| 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering Mathematics | 12 | 15 | 12 | 13 |
| Geomechanics | 15 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| Mining Methods | 6 | 4 | 11 | 9 |
| Mine Ventilation | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Mine Surveying | 7 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Systems Engineering | 8 | 7 | 3 | 5 |
| Mining Machinery | 4 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Engineering Mechanics | 5 | 5 | 3 | 7 |
| Underground Hazards | 4 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| Surface Environment | 3 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
| Ground Control | 6 | 4 | 6 | 1 |
| Development and blasting | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| Mine Planning | 2 | 6 | 5 | 2 |
| Mineral Economics | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Mining Geology | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Shading: 10+ darkest, 6–9, 3–5, under 3 lightest.
Our classification of the official papers; subject marks out of 85.
| 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | Subject | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 15 | 12 | 13 | Engineering Mathematics | 13 |
| 15 | 9 | 8 | 8 | Geomechanics | 10 |
| 6 | 4 | 11 | 9 | Mining Methods | 7.5 |
| 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 | Mine Ventilation | 6.25 |
| 7 | 5 | 6 | 6 | Mine Surveying | 6 |
| 8 | 7 | 3 | 5 | Systems Engineering | 5.75 |
| 4 | 6 | 7 | 4 | Mining Machinery | 5.25 |
| 5 | 5 | 3 | 7 | Engineering Mechanics | 5 |
| 4 | 6 | 2 | 6 | Underground Hazards | 4.5 |
| 3 | 4 | 7 | 4 | Surface Environment | 4.5 |
| 6 | 4 | 6 | 1 | Ground Control | 4.25 |
| 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | Development and blasting | 3.75 |
| 2 | 6 | 5 | 2 | Mine Planning | 3.75 |
| 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | Mineral Economics | 3.25 |
| 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | Mining Geology | 2.25 |
Our classification. Borderline items (for example reliability, regression significance) could reasonably be placed elsewhere, which moves a subject by a mark or two.
Three patterns are worth acting on. Engineering Mathematics is the most reliable block at 12–15 marks, and the 2027 syllabus rewords its probability and statistics line (see our syllabus-changes guide). Geomechanics fell from 15 marks in 2023 to 8 in 2025 and 2026 — still large, but no longer dominant. And the small subjects are not small in total: Mineral Economics, Mine Planning and Systems Engineering together were worth 10–16 marks a year, nearly all of it numerical.
The numericals that repeat
| Topic | Asked in |
|---|---|
| Continuous miner and shuttle car cycle output | 2023 Q46, 2024 Q64, 2025 Q44 (and depillaring, 2026 Q61) |
| Longwall shearer output, cuts, AFC | 2023 Q34, 2025 Q65, 2026 Q60 |
| Mohr-Coulomb, triaxial, principal and maximum shear stress | Every year: 2023 Q30, 2024 Q22 and Q54, 2025 Q17 and Q38, 2026 Q65 |
| Stress around a circular opening | 2023 Q47, 2024 Q55 |
| Subsidence critical width | 2023 Q32, 2025 Q51 |
| Pillar safety factor | 2023 Q48, 2025 Q53 |
| Ground vibration PPV (scaled distance) | 2024 Q61, 2026 Q58 |
| Natural ventilation pressure, booster fans, evasee | 2023 Q43 and Q64, 2024 Q37, 2026 Q26, Q40 and Q52 |
| Atkinson’s equation and airway resistance | 2025 Q32 and Q61 |
| NPV and depreciation | NPV 2023 Q61, 2025 Q60, 2026 Q51; depreciation 2026 Q50 |
| Cut-off grade, dilution, recovery | 2024 Q58–59, 2025 Q35 and Q45, 2026 Q46 |
| Queuing (shovel and dumper) | 2024 Q19, 2025 Q26, 2026 Q42 |
| Assignment and transportation problems | 2023 Q57–58, 2025 Q37, 2026 Q47 |
| PERT/CPM | 2023 Q22, 2024 Q20, 2026 Q31 |
| Tacheometry, traverse, levelling | 2024 Q41 and Q48, 2025 Q41 and Q63, 2026 Q62 |
| Blast design (charge per delay, burden, VOD, circuit resistance) | Every year |
| BOD / DO, noise Leq, dust settling | 2024 Q29–30, 2025 Q57 and Q64, 2026 Q53–54 |
| Coal Mines Regulations 2017 and DGMS content | 2023 Q23 and Q35, 2024 Q14–15 and Q63, 2025 Q25 |
Question numbers from the official MN papers and final keys; the grouping is ours. Legislation questions were 1-mark MCQs; no MSQ has touched legislation.
The legislation row deserves a note. Coal Mines Regulations and DGMS circulars appear for one to three marks a year, always as MCQs. On the other side, kriging was not asked in any paper from 2023 to 2026 — geostatistics appeared once, as a semivariogram question in 2024 (Q18). Weight your time by the table, not by what feels like an important chapter.
Formula bank for the repeat numericals
Tick each formula once you can use it in a timed question without notes.
0 of 24 done
Ticks are saved only in this browser on this device.
Official papers and keys
| Year | Session | Question paper | Final key |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Saturday 7 Feb 2026, forenoon | MN 2026 (official PDF) | MN 2026 key (official PDF) |
| 2025 | Single session | MN 2025 (official PDF) | MN 2025 key (official PDF) |
| 2024 | Single session | MN 2024 (official PDF) | MN 2024 key (official PDF) |
| 2023 | Single session | On the GATE 2027 downloads page | MN 2023 key (official PDF) |
All links are in the sources below. The GATE 2027 downloads page carries MN papers and keys back to 2007.
Practise it, don't just read it
Previous papers show you what comes; timed topic quizzes show you whether you can do it. Start with the free one.
The ProSyllabus GATE MN library has topic quizzes on mine surveying corrections, rock mass classification, shaft sinking and winding, creep in rock, mine planning, mineral economics and underground hazards — the first quiz is free.
Where can I download GATE Mining previous year papers?
From the GATE 2027 downloads page (IIT Madras), which has MN papers and final keys; direct links for 2024–2026 are in the sources.
How many NAT questions are in GATE MN?
By marks, 48–56 of the 85 subject marks were NAT in 2023–2026.
Does GATE MN have MSQs?
Rarely: none in 2023 or 2024, one in 2025 (Q42) and one in 2026 (Q29).
Which topics repeat most in GATE Mining?
Mohr-Coulomb and blast design every year; continuous miner cycles, longwall output, ventilation pressure, NPV, cut-off grade, queuing and surveying in three of four years.
Is kriging important for GATE MN?
It was not asked in 2023–2026; one semivariogram question appeared in 2024.
How much Engineering Mathematics is in GATE MN?
About 13 marks: 12, 15, 12 and 13 in 2023–2026 by our count.
Are Coal Mines Regulations asked in GATE MN?
Yes, one to three marks a year, as MCQs.
More in this series
- Coal India MT through GATE Mining: every cut-off list
- PSUs hiring mining engineers through GATE
- GATE MN marks vs score vs rank 2023–2026
- GATE MN 2027 syllabus: what changed
- M.Tech after GATE Mining: IIT and NIT cut-offs
- GATE MN notice board — official updates
- GATE Mining Engineering: the complete guide
- GATE MN paper analysis
- GATE Mining: cut-offs, colleges and placements
Sources
- official — GATE 2026 MN question paper (PDF)
- official — GATE 2026 MN final answer key (PDF)
- official — GATE 2025 MN question paper (PDF)
- official — GATE 2025 MN final answer key (PDF)
- official — GATE 2024 MN question paper (PDF)
- official — GATE 2024 MN final answer key (PDF)
- official — GATE 2023 MN final answer key (PDF; the 2023 paper is on the same downloads page)
- official — GATE 2027 — Downloads (previous papers and keys)
- official — GATE 2027 Information Brochure, IIT Madras (revised 17 Sep 2026)
- official — GATE 2027 — Two-paper combinations (MN: none)
- official — GATE 2027 MN syllabus (PDF)
- official — GATE 2026 — examination schedule
official = a document published by the conducting body. reported = a news or coaching site we could not check against an original. Where sources disagree this page says so rather than picking one.
















