Independent practice for the Fast Stream Assessment Centre
Write 4 tasks in 55 minutes, then see what to fix and fix it
In the Written Exercise you play a fast streamer overseeing a project. The official guide gives you 55 minutes to review the information and complete 4 written tasks, using the template you are given, and suggests you may want to spend 20 minutes reviewing the pack and 35 minutes writing, whatever works best for you. This simulator runs that clock on invented packs: data, conflicting stakeholder views and 4 tasks to write. Then you get feedback on each task with quotes from your answer, each checked against what you wrote, a model answer, and the chance to rewrite your weakest task and have it marked again.
Look inside: the first pack
Helping small firms take on apprentices
The department, the areas, the pilots, the organisations, the people, the events and every figure in this pack are invented for practice.
It is January 2027. You work in the Department for Skills and Local Growth, which advises on and funds policies that help people gain skills and help local economies grow. You are a new fast streamer overseeing the Small Firm Apprenticeships project.
Small firms, those with fewer than 50 staff, employ many young people, but in the department's 2026 employer survey only 9% of small firms said they had taken on an apprentice in the last three years. The most common reasons given were the cost of wages while the apprentice trains, the paperwork, and the risk that the apprentice leaves or the firm cannot keep them busy.
Two pilots ran, each in a different area. Small firms recruited new apprentices aged 16 to 24 from January to December 2025, and each apprentice was followed up 12 months after they started, so the last results came in at the end of December 2026. Each area is compared with the apprentices aged 16 to 24 who started with its small firms in 2024, followed up in the same way. Rolled out nationally, either scheme would be for new apprentices aged 16 to 24 at the start of their apprenticeship, in firms with fewer than 50 staff.
The Minister for Skills and Local Growth has asked for your recommendation on whether one of the schemes should be rolled out across England. Several organisations have strong and conflicting views. Whatever is decided, young people can already search and apply for apprenticeships through the government's apprenticeship search service.
The options
- Wage Top-Up (Northmoor): The firm employs the apprentice directly and can receive up to £3,000 for each new apprentice: £1,500 when the apprentice starts and a further £1,500 if they are still on their apprenticeship 12 months after starting.
- Shared Apprenticeship Agency (Eastbrook): A not-for-profit agency employs the apprentice and places them with one or more small firms, which pay the agency an hourly fee. The agency handles pay, paperwork and training arrangements, and finds the apprentice a new placement if a firm drops out. In the results, an apprentice employed by the agency and placed with a small firm counts as an apprentice in a small firm.
Your tasks. Read the information and complete these 4 tasks:
- Make a recommendation in writing to the Minister on which scheme, if either, should be rolled out across England, and why.
- Write an email to Joanne Pryce explaining your recommendation, addressing the concerns in her letter (Item 4) and reassuring her. If you recommend neither scheme, explain why and what happens next.
- Assume the Minister has accepted your recommendation. Write a short piece for school newsletters telling parents and carers what the scheme offers young people and how to find out more (details will be on the department's apprenticeships web page). If you recommend neither scheme, explain what young people can do now instead.
- Write a note for the project board setting out the three most important risks to the national roll-out you recommend, in order of priority with a reason for the order, how you would manage each, and one measure the board should watch. If you recommend neither scheme, cover the risks of that decision instead.
Items 1 and 2 are open here. Items 3 to 7 (Policy Analysis Unit: costs; Letter from Joanne Pryce, Chair of the Small Employers' Alliance; Survey of small firms, December 2026; Letter from the Eastbrook and Northmoor Colleges Partnership; From a discussion at the department's youth panel) open with the simulator.
The full simulator: 9 full runs, every item, your report and the rewrites
- 3 different packs, 7 items each, with data and conflicting stakeholder views
- 4 written tasks in an on-screen template, against one 55-minute clock
- Feedback on each task, with quotes from your answer checked against what you wrote: what worked, what to fix first, figures to check
- A model answer for every task
- Rewrite your weakest task and have it marked again (2 rewrites a run)
How a run works
- 55 minutes, one clock. Read the background, the options and the 7 items, and write your 4 tasks in the on-screen template: a recommendation to a minister, an email to a worried stakeholder, a message for the public and a risk note. The bar shows how long you read before you started writing. Your answers are submitted by themselves at 0.
- Your report. For each task: practice scores on our own rubric, what worked, what to fix first, figures from the pack the marker thinks you got wrong, and points you did not use, with quotes from your answer, each checked against what you wrote. Also our reading of your writing against the 4 dimensions the official page names, and the time and words you used.
- A model answer for every task, written for the pack.
- Rewrite. Rewrite your weakest task, or any other, and only that task is marked again, with your old and new marks shown side by side.
Before you start
Is this the real exercise?
No. The 55 minutes and the 4 tasks follow the official Fast Stream Assessment Centre guide, and the packs follow the shape of its published example: background on a project, several items of information with data and stakeholder views, and written tasks for different readers. The organisations, places, people and figures in our packs are invented. The official guide says the actual exercise will have different content from its example. Its example lists 3 tasks while the page says 4; our packs set 4.
Is the template the official one?
No. On the day you will receive a template in Microsoft Word by email. Ours is a box for each task on the page, with headings to write under. The word lengths shown are our suggestion; the official page does not set any.
Who marks it, and is it an official score?
A computer model marks it, following our own practice rubric: 5 lines for each task, built on the official list of what a good response looks like, scored from 1 to 4. It also gives its reading of your writing against Think, Relate, Adapt and Strive, the 4 dimensions the official page names. None of this is an official score; the official pages cited here do not set out a marking scheme. Every quote in the report is checked against what you wrote, and a quote that is not your own words is left out.
How does the rewrite work?
After your report, choose a task, change it and send it. Only that task is marked again, against the same rubric, and you see the old and new marks side by side. Your other tasks keep their marks. Each run comes with 2 rewrites.
Is what I write kept?
Your drafts are kept on this device while you write. Once you submit, we keep your answers and your report so that you can re-read them, and they are deleted if you delete your account.
Is practising with a simulator allowed?
The Fast Stream's guidance on Generative AI says you can use Gen AI tools to prepare, including for practice and simulation, but must not use them during the actual tests and assessments.
How do I pay?
One card payment, no subscription. Prices are charged in your own currency where we support it. Access opens straight after payment on this device; sign in afterwards to keep it on your account. Purchase policy.
Also at the assessment centre: the Personal Development Conversation
It is a 30-minute, one-to-one structured discussion with an assessor, assessed on Relate, Adapt and Strive. Practise it with our FSAC interview practice: find your own examples first, then take practice conversations with follow-up questions.
Sources
Official pages read on 24 October 2026:
- Civil Service Careers: Fast Stream Assessment Centre guide, Written Exercise (format, what is assessed, tips, the official example)
- Civil Service Careers: Fast Stream Assessment Centre guide, About the Fast Stream Assessment Centre
- Civil Service Careers: Fast Stream Assessment Centre guide, What is assessed and how to prepare
- Civil Service Careers: Guidance on the use of Generative AI