Complete Summary and Solutions for Theory of Consumer Behaviour – NCERT Class XII Economics, Chapter 2 – Utility Analysis, Budget Constraints, Demand Curve, Elasticity

This chapter explains the behavior of an individual consumer in choosing goods based on budget constraints and preferences. It covers Cardinal Utility Analysis and Ordinal Utility Analysis, indifference curves, budget sets, consumer's optimum, demand function, law of demand, market demand, and price elasticity of demand with detailed examples, diagrams, and exercises.

Updated: 1 week ago

Categories: NCERT, Class XII, Economics, Chapter 2, Consumer Behaviour, Utility, Budget Constraint, Demand, Elasticity, Microeconomics, Summary, Questions, Answers
Tags: Consumer Behaviour, Utility, Marginal Utility, Indifference Curve, Budget Set, Demand Curve, Law of Demand, Market Demand, Elasticity of Demand, NCERT, Class 12, Economics, Chapter 2, Summary, Questions, Answers
Post Thumbnail
Theory of Consumer Behaviour - Class 12 NCERT Chapter 2 Ultimate Study Guide 2025

Theory of Consumer Behaviour

Chapter 2: Theory of Consumer Behaviour - Ultimate Study Guide | NCERT Class 12 Notes, Questions, Examples & Quiz 2025

Full Chapter Summary & Detailed Notes - Theory of Consumer Behaviour Class 12 NCERT

Overview & Key Concepts

  • Chapter Goal: Explain how consumers maximize satisfaction from limited income; covers cardinal/ordinal utility, indifference curves, budget constraints. Exam Focus: Utility measures, DMU, IC features, MRS, budget line (diagrams, derivations); 2025 Updates: Real-world apps (e.g., digital goods utility, inflation on budgets). Fun Fact: Utility is subjective – a coffee's value rises during exams. Core Idea: Preferences + affordability = optimal bundle; interlinks choices with markets. Real-World: Shopping decisions, policy (subsidies). Expanded: All subtopics (2.1-2.2) point-wise with evidence, examples, debates (cardinal vs. ordinal realism); added consumer psychology, modern examples (e.g., streaming services as substitutes).
  • Wider Scope: Foundations for demand theory; two-good simplicity for diagrams; sources: Hypotheticals, tables/graphs.
  • Expanded Content: Include TU/MU tables, IC derivations, budget math; multi-disciplinary (psychology in preferences).
Total and Marginal Utility Diagram (Figure 2.1 Description)

X-axis: Quantity of commodity (0-6 units); Y-axis: Utility units (0-30). TU curve rises then flattens (peaks at 24), MU declines from 12 to -2. Shows DMU: MU falls as consumption increases.

Preliminary Notations and Assumptions

  • Consumer Choice Problem: Decide spending on goods for max satisfaction; depends on preferences (likes) and budget (income/prices).
  • Simplification: Two goods (bananas x1, mangoes x2); bundles as (x1, x2), e.g., (5,10) = 5 bananas + 10 mangoes; x1, x2 ≥ 0.
  • Approaches: (i) Cardinal Utility (measurable utils); (ii) Ordinal (ranking bundles).
  • Expanded: Real examples (e.g., food vs. entertainment); debates (two-good limit vs. multi-good reality); notes on goods including services.

2.1 Utility

  • Definition: Want-satisfying power of a commodity; subjective (varies by person, time, place); e.g., chocolate higher for lovers, heater in winter/Ladakh.
  • Expanded: Ties to psychology (diminishing desire); examples (water vs. diamonds paradox preview).

2.1.1 Cardinal Utility Analysis

  • Assumption: Utility measurable in numbers (e.g., shirt = 50 utils).
  • Measures of Utility:
    • Total Utility (TU): Total satisfaction from n units; TUn = sum of MUs; increases with quantity but at diminishing rate.
    • Marginal Utility (MU): Additional satisfaction from one more unit; MUn = TUn - TUn-1; e.g., 5th banana: MU5 = 30 - 28 = 2.
  • Example Table 2.1: Units 1-6; TU: 12,18,22,24,24,22; MU:12,6,4,2,0,-2. TU peaks at 5 units, MU zero then negative.
  • Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility (DMU): MU falls as consumption rises (other goods constant); reason: Desire weakens after some consumption; e.g., successive bananas less satisfying.
  • Implications: Explains why TU rises at decreasing rate; MU=0 when TU constant; negative MU when TU falls (disutility).
  • Derivation of Demand Curve (Single Commodity): Demand = quantity affordable/willing at price; curve: Downward sloping (negative price-quantity relation = Law of Demand).
  • Explanation via DMU: Lower MU for extra units → willing to pay less; e.g., at Rs.40, demand 5 units; 6th unit only if price < Rs.40 (Figure 2.2: Downward curve, x-axis quantity, y-axis price).
  • Expanded: Debates (real measurability?); apps (pricing strategies); math: TU = ∑MU.
Demand Curve Diagram (Figure 2.2 Description)

X-axis: Quantity (0-100); Y-axis: Price (Rs.0-40). Downward curve from (0,40) to (100,0); shows more quantity at lower prices due to DMU.

2.1.2 Ordinal Utility Analysis

  • Drawback of Cardinal: Unrealistic numbering; ordinal ranks bundles (more/less preferred) without numbers.
  • Indifference Curve (IC): Locus of bundles giving equal utility (indifferent); e.g., points A,B,C,D on IC (Figure 2.3: Downward curve, x-axis bananas, y-axis mangoes).
  • Slope & Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS): IC downward (more bananas → fewer mangoes for same utility); MRS = |Δy/Δx| = mangoes forgone for +1 banana; e.g., MRS=3 means 3 mangoes for 1 banana.
  • Law of Diminishing MRS: MRS falls as bananas rise (MU_banana falls, MU_mango rises); Table 2.2: Combos A(1,15)-D(4,9); MRS 3:1 → 1:1. Reason: Less willingness to sacrifice as one good dominates.
  • Shape of IC: Convex to origin (diminishing MRS); straight for perfect substitutes (constant MRS=1); e.g., 5-rupee notes/coins (Table 2.3: Constant 1:1; Figure 2.4: Straight line).
  • Indifference Map: Family of ICs (Figure 2.5: Parallel downward curves); higher IC = preferred (monotonic preferences: more of one good ≥ other preferred).
  • Features of IC:
    • Downward Slope: Increase one good requires decrease other (Figure 2.6: From left-right, slope negative; Δx1>0 → Δx2<0).
    • Higher IC Better: Positive MU → prefer more; Table 2.4: A(1,10), B(2,10), C(3,10) on rising ICs (Figure 2.7: Higher curves for more bananas).
    • No Intersection: Leads to contradiction (same utility conflicting); e.g., IC1/IC2 cross at A, but B>C impossible (Figure 2.8: Points A,B on IC1; A,C on IC2 → B=C absurd).
  • Monotonic Preferences: Bundle with ≥ one good and > other preferred; ensures higher IC better.
  • Expanded: Debates (convexity assumptions); apps (product bundling); math: MRS = MUx/MUy.
Indifference Curve Diagram (Figure 2.3 Description)

X-axis: Bananas (1-4); Y-axis: Mangoes (9-15). Convex downward curve connecting A(1,15), B(2,12), C(3,10), D(4,9); shows diminishing MRS.

Indifference Map (Figure 2.5 Description)

Multiple convex ICs, higher ones northeast; arrow shows preference direction; bundles on upper IC preferred.

No Intersection (Figure 2.8 Description)

Two ICs crossing at A; B on IC1 (higher mangoes), C on IC2 (lower); contradiction as B should > C.

2.2 The Consumer’s Budget

  • Budget Constraint: Fixed income M, prices p1 (bananas), p2 (mangoes); affordable if p1x1 + p2x2 ≤ M.
  • Budget Set: All bundles satisfying inequality; graphical: Area below budget line.
  • Budget Line: Equality p1x1 + p2x2 = M; intercepts: M/p1 (x1), M/p2 (x2); slope = -p1/p2 (trade-off rate).
  • Example 2.1: M=Rs20, p1=p2=Rs5 (integral units); affordable: (0,0) to (4,0), etc.; boundary costs exactly 20.
  • Expanded: Shifts (income up → outward); rotations (price change); apps (inflation erodes set).

Summary

  • Utility (cardinal: TU/MU/DMU → demand; ordinal: IC/MRS/map/features) + budget (set/line) explain choices. Interlinks: To Ch4 demand. Evidence: Tables/figures; debates on measurability.
  • Expanded: Consumer equilibrium preview (tangency).

Why This Guide Stands Out

Comprehensive: All subtopics point-wise, diagrams described; 2025 with apps (e.g., e-commerce bundles), math derivations for depth.

Key Themes & Tips

  • Aspects: Subjectivity, trade-offs, convexity.
  • Tip: Sketch ICs/budget; calc MRS; compare cardinal/ordinal pros/cons.

Exam Case Studies

DMU in pricing; IC in welfare analysis.

Project & Group Ideas

  • Survey utility rankings.
  • Debate: Cardinal vs. ordinal relevance.
  • Model budget for student expenses.