Checked 6 October 2026. Statistics are those of the 24 April 2026 result notice; the method text is the 2026 bulletin (Appendices V and VI) and the 14 June 2026 clarification. NTA can change the method for 2027, and a 2027 bulletin would replace the percentile section. The subject-wise counts were read from an image annex, and only the eleven largest papers are used.
CUET PG 2026 results were declared on 24 April 2026 and, by NTA's own later account, were prepared on the actual marks candidates scored. The Information Bulletin describes a percentile-based normalisation for multi-shift papers, and a reader of the bulletin alone would expect percentiles. The public notice of 14 June 2026 says otherwise for 2026: the results were prepared on the basis of "actual marks obtained by candidates" in their subjects. That is the phrase to hold on to when a page tells you your score was normalised.
All counts are from NTA's result notice of 24 April 2026; the percentage is our division.
ProSyllabus is an independent study site. We are not affiliated with, or endorsed by, the National Testing Agency, the University Grants Commission or any university named here. Every rule below is quoted or summarised from their published documents, and the documents control if anything here differs.
The conflict: normalisation in the bulletin, actual marks in the result
Two official documents describe the scoring differently, so both are set out here. The bulletin's section 10.1 says that for pre-planned multi-shift papers, raw marks obtained in different shifts "will be converted to NTA Score" using the procedure in Appendix V, which is a percentile-based normalisation. Appendix V then says the percentile score "will be the Normalized Score" and used for the merit lists. The 14 June 2026 notice, issued after the result and after social-media questions about the re-scheduled sittings, says the results were prepared on actual marks, that the re-scheduled cohort was too small to normalise against the main population, and that its papers had been prepared in advance and certified as of equivalent difficulty.
| Document | What it says about scoring | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Information Bulletin 2026, section 10.1 and Appendices V and VI | Multi-shift raw marks converted to an NTA Score through percentile normalisation | 16 Dec 2025 |
| Result notice, toppers' annex and counts | Gives marks out of 300 and counts; the toppers are listed by marks obtained | 24 Apr 2026 |
| Public notice on the re-scheduled exam | Results prepared on the basis of actual marks; no normalisation for the re-scheduled cohort | 14 Jun 2026 |
Where other pages get this wrong
NTA says the CUET PG 2026 results were prepared on actual marks, not on normalised percentiles.
Commonly published instead: Your CUET PG score is a normalised percentile, as in the bulletin's Appendix V.
Appendix V describes the method NTA may use for multi-shift papers; the 14 June 2026 clarification states what it did for 2026. DU's cut-off lists for 2026-27 carry values from -20 to 282, which is what raw marks out of 300 look like. We have not seen an NTA statement for 2027, so do not assume either method.
Our reading, labelled as such: the percentile procedure is the rule NTA published for multi-shift papers, but the notice of 14 June 2026 reports that for 2026 the result used actual marks. We do not know whether NTA applied normalisation to any subject that had comparable shifts before the 14 June clarification, so we do not claim that it did or did not. If your score card shows marks out of 300, it is on actual marks.
The 2026 result in numbers
NTA's 24 April notice gives registered and appeared counts in two ways: by unique candidate (a candidate who registered for four papers counts once) and by subject (each test counted separately). The exam ran on 17 days between 6 and 30 March 2026, across 50 shifts and 157 subjects, for 4,11,366 unique candidates.
| Unique candidates | Registered | Appeared | Appeared as % of registered (ours) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 2,32,965 | 1,98,060 | 85.0% |
| Male | 1,78,391 | 1,47,151 | 82.5% |
| Third Gender | 10 | 9 | 90.0% |
| Total | 4,11,366 | 3,45,220 | 83.9% |
| Category | Registered | Appeared | Appeared as % of registered (ours) |
|---|---|---|---|
| General | 1,60,099 | 1,31,748 | 82.3% |
| OBC (non-creamy layer) | 1,37,809 | 1,18,165 | 85.7% |
| SC | 45,954 | 38,518 | 83.8% |
| EWS | 30,851 | 26,892 | 87.2% |
| ST | 36,653 | 29,897 | 81.6% |
| Total | 4,11,366 | 3,45,220 | 83.9% |
Each bar is appeared divided by registered for that category, from the 24 April 2026 notice. The scale starts at zero.
Women made up 56.6% of registrations and 57.4% of those who appeared (our division). Of the 4,11,366 candidates 66,146 did not appear at all, which is 16.1%. By subject the picture is different: 7,14,621 test registrations and 5,04,301 appeared, which is 70.6%. That is about 1.74 papers per registered candidate (our division), and it means a candidate who sat some papers often skipped others.
| Code | Paper | Registered | Appeared | Appeared % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COQP12 | General - Management | 66,188 | 47,372 | 71.6% |
| COQP11 | General | 59,016 | 40,643 | 68.9% |
| SCQP09 | Computer Science / IT / AI | 39,422 | 31,274 | 79.3% |
| HUQP18 | Political Science | 37,732 | 26,476 | 70.2% |
| COQP03 | B.Ed., B.Ed.-M.Ed. Integrated and related | 29,810 | 21,069 | 70.7% |
| LAQP01 | English | 26,835 | 16,361 | 61.0% |
| COQP10 | Economics | 22,011 | 15,210 | 69.1% |
| HUQP09 | History | 19,400 | 13,580 | 70.0% |
| COQP04 | B.Ed. Humanities and Social Sciences | 17,031 | 10,785 | 63.3% |
| COQP08 | Commerce | 16,833 | 11,059 | 65.7% |
| SCQP08 | Chemistry | 14,929 | 11,846 | 79.3% |
Counts of candidates who appeared in each paper. The largest eleven papers are shown; the notice lists all 157.
These counts tell you how big the field was for each code, which is useful context for a cut-off, but they are not scores. NTA's notice lists the top five scorers in each large subject by name and marks; we do not reproduce names. The 14 June annex also lists the top 100 marks in the re-scheduled subjects.
The re-scheduled sitting: who, how many, and why it mattered
Not every candidate sat on the scheduled day. The 14 June notice says examinations at some centres could not be held as planned: centres in Tura, Meghalaya, where local disturbances affected the conduct of the exam, and certain overseas centres affected by the security situation. NTA held a special re-scheduled exam on 29 and 30 March 2026 for 534 unique candidates from Tura and 31 from overseas centres, across 28 subjects. It says the exam was a welfare measure, used the same marking scheme and papers prepared in advance and certified as of equivalent difficulty, and was evaluated on actual marks, because a cohort that small could not be compared with the main population.
| Item | Figure |
|---|---|
| Candidates re-examined from Tura (Meghalaya) | 534 unique candidates |
| Candidates re-examined from overseas centres | 31 |
| Subjects affected | 28 |
| Dates of the re-scheduled sitting | 29 and 30 March 2026 |
| How it was scored | Same marking scheme, actual marks, no normalisation (14 June 2026 notice) |
How NTA's percentile method works, with its own worked example
Even though 2026 used actual marks, the method in Appendix V is worth understanding, because it is the published rule for multi-shift papers and 2027 may use it. A candidate's percentile score is 100 multiplied by the number of candidates in the same session with a raw score equal to or less than theirs, divided by the number who appeared in that session. The topper of each session gets 100. The percentile is computed to seven decimal places to reduce ties, and it is not an average of subject percentiles and not the same as a percentage of marks.
| Candidate | Raw score | Candidates at or below (of 41,326) | Percentile in the bulletin | Percentile by our division |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 331 | 41,326 | 100.0000000 | 100.0000000 |
| B | 121 | 37,244 | 90.1224411 | 90.1224411 |
| C | 41 | 20,851 | 50.4549194 | 50.4549194 |
| D | 25 | 13,102 | 31.7040120 | 31.7040120 |
| E | -15 | 456 | 1.1034216 | 1.1034216 |
The table is the bulletin's own Session-3 example (Day 2, Shift 1, 41,326 candidates). Our recomputed column matches the printed one to seven decimals for all five candidates, which is a useful check that the formula is what the document says. Notice what it shows: candidate B scores 121 raw and gets about 90.12, while candidate C scores 41 and gets about 50.45. A candidate with the same raw score in a harder shift, where fewer people reach it, would sit at a higher percentile; that is the point of the method.
Percentile calculator (the bulletin's formula)
The bulletin defines the percentile as 100 multiplied by the number of candidates in your shift who scored equal to or less than you, divided by the number who appeared in that shift. Enter your shift's size and how many candidates scored higher than you. The starting values reproduce candidate B in the bulletin's own example (90.1224411).
This is the method the bulletin describes for multi-shift papers. The 2026 results were prepared on actual marks (see the notice of 14 June 2026), so the percentile here is an illustration of the method, not your 2026 result. You cannot know the true count of higher scorers in your shift, so use it to see how the formula behaves.
Appendix V also fixes the rule for eligibility when shifts differ. If the percentile equivalent of the qualifying marks is not the same in every shift, the lowest of them becomes the eligibility cut-off for all shifts. Its example: if 40 per cent marks correspond to 78 in one shift and 79 in another, everyone at or above 78 in both shifts is eligible in the general category. Candidates are distributed into sessions at random, which the bulletin says avoids bias.
Answer keys, challenges and the result
NTA published the provisional answer keys, the question papers and each candidate's recorded responses on 11 April 2026 and invited challenges until 14 April, at Rs 200 a question (non-refundable), with the last payment at 10 am on 14 April. The bulletin says the key is displayed "likely for two to three days"; the 2026 window was four days. Challenges are examined by subject experts, an accepted challenge changes the key for all candidates, nobody is told individually whether theirs was accepted, and the result is prepared on the final key. After the result no grievance about the key is entertained, and the bulletin says there is no re-evaluation or re-checking. NTA hosts the final answer keys for 2026 on its site.
| Cycle | Last exam day | Key challenge window | Result | Days from last regular exam day to result (ours) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUET PG 2024 | 28 Mar 2024 | 5 to 7 Apr 2024 | 13 Apr 2024 | 16 |
| CUET PG 2025 | 1 Apr 2025 | 22 to 24 Apr 2025 | 6 May 2025 | 35 |
| CUET PG 2026 | 27 Mar 2026 (re-scheduled 29 and 30 Mar) | 11 to 14 Apr 2026 | 24 Apr 2026 | 28 |
The gap from the last regular exam day to the result was 16 days in 2024, 35 in 2025 and 28 in 2026 (our subtraction from the dates above; 25 days if you count from the re-scheduled sitting of 30 March). The key challenge window sat in the middle of that gap each time. Plan the post-exam period as about two to five weeks, not two days.
Downloading your scorecard, and what it is valid for
The scorecard is on NTA's CUET (PG) site using your application number and date of birth, and from 28 April 2026 also on DigiLocker, where NTA's notice gives a step-by-step procedure that needs a DigiLocker account linked to Aadhaar and your CUET PG registration and roll numbers. NTA does not send score cards by post. The score is valid only for admission in 2026-27, and NTA shares scores and candidate data with participating universities. Some universities then pull the score themselves: the University of Delhi's CSAS (PG) document says it auto-integrates name, date of birth, category, gender, parents' names and CUET score through DigiLocker and API Setu, and will not change data received that way.
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Where to download | NTA CUET (PG) site with application number and date of birth; also DigiLocker from 28 April 2026 |
| Validity | Admission year 2026-27 only (bulletin 10.1) |
| Re-evaluation or re-checking | None (bulletin 10.2) |
| Grievance about the result | Bulletin 11.3: any grievance or representation arising out of the result is entertained only if raised within 30 days of the declaration. This does not reopen the final answer key, which cannot be challenged after the result |
| Records kept | Up to 90 days from the result declaration (bulletin 11.2) |
| Admission queries | To the university, not NTA (bulletin 10.3) |
What the score card does not do is rank you. NTA's notices that we read publish counts, the top scorers' marks and the answer keys, not an all-India rank list or cut-off. Your position comes from the university's merit list, so the next step after the result is each university's own process. For the University of Delhi we have set out the published round-by-round minimum scores in the university guide below.
Practise it, don't just read it
Raw marks reward accuracy under negative marking, so reading questions closely matters as much as speed. If your paper includes English comprehension, the free passage quiz is a quick check on inference questions.
One free ten-question quiz is live for CUET PG today: Reading Comprehension Inference Questions. It practises the reading-comprehension skill that the General Paper (COQP11) and the General - Management paper (COQP12) both list under English. We have no subject-wise CUET PG quiz library, so treat it as a taster for that one skill, not as a way to prepare for a subject paper.
Frequently asked questions
When was the CUET PG 2026 result declared?
On 24 April 2026. NTA also made the score card available on DigiLocker on 28 April 2026. The exam had run from 6 March, with a re-scheduled sitting on 29 and 30 March.
Is the CUET PG score a percentile or raw marks?
For 2026, NTA's notice of 14 June 2026 says the results were prepared on actual marks obtained. The bulletin describes a percentile normalisation procedure for multi-shift papers, but the notice says that is not what was applied to the re-scheduled cohort and the results were on actual marks.
How is the CUET PG percentile calculated?
Per the bulletin, 100 multiplied by the number of candidates in your session who scored equal to or less than you, divided by the number who appeared in that session, to seven decimal places. The topper of each session gets 100.
How many candidates appeared in CUET PG 2026?
3,45,220 unique candidates out of 4,11,366 registered (83.9 per cent, our division). By subject, 5,04,301 of 7,14,621 test registrations appeared.
Can I challenge the CUET PG answer key?
Yes, during the window NTA announces, at Rs 200 per question, non-refundable. In 2026 the window ran from 11 to 14 April. NTA does not tell candidates individually whether a challenge was accepted, and there is no re-evaluation after the result.
Is my CUET PG 2026 score valid for 2027 admission?
No. The bulletin says the score is valid for admission to the 2026-27 academic year only.
Where do I download the CUET PG scorecard?
From NTA's CUET (PG) site using your application number and date of birth, or from DigiLocker, where the CUET PG score card appears in an Aadhaar-linked account after you enter your registration number, roll number and exam year.
Sources
- official — NTA: Information Bulletin CUET (PG) 2026 (70 pages, uploaded 16 December 2025)
- official — NTA: Frequently Asked Questions, CUET (PG) 2026 (uploaded 24 December 2025)
- official — NTA public notice, 24 April 2026: declaration of result, with subject-wise registered and appeared counts
- official — NTA public notice, 14 June 2026: clarification on the re-scheduled exam and the methodology for results
- official — NTA public notice, 28 April 2026: score card on DigiLocker
- official — NTA public notice, 11 April 2026: provisional answer keys, challenge 11 to 14 April, Rs 200 a question
- official — NTA public notice, 13 April 2026: advisory on the challenge window
- official — NTA: final answer keys, CUET (PG) 2026
- official — NTA press release, 6 May 2025: CUET (PG) 2025 result
- official — NTA press release, 13 April 2024: CUET (PG) 2024 result
- official — NTA public notice, 22 April 2025: provisional answer keys, challenge 22 to 24 April
- official — NTA public notice, 5 April 2024: provisional answer keys, challenge 5 to 7 April
- official — University of Delhi: CSAS(PG) 2026 document (rules for two-year PG admission), 15 May 2026
- official — NTA: CUET (PG) home page, notices and syllabus
official = a document published by the conducting body. reported = a news or coaching site we could not check against an original. Where sources disagree this page says so rather than picking one.
More in this series
- CUET PG dates, registration, city slip and admit card
- CUET PG exam pattern, marking scheme and paper codes
- CUET PG syllabus by paper code, with official PDF links
- CUET PG participating universities, DU cut-off and counselling
- CUET PG application, detailed syllabus, pattern and top universities (existing guide)
- CUET PG exam date, syllabus, pattern, application and preparation (existing guide)
- CUET PG alerts and updates
- AP PGCET vs TS CPGET vs CUET PG: which PG entrance to write
- CUET UG normalisation: raw marks, percentile and the NTA score (the UG counterpart)












