Checked 27 October 2026. What the BSB publishes, and the exam format, were read in the Bar Qualification Manual Part 3C, the Chair’s reports and the Professional Ethics pages on 27 October 2026. Check the BSB pages for updates before your sitting; check them before relying on a detail.
None of the Bar Standards Board pages we read publishes a past paper for the Criminal Litigation or Civil Litigation centralised assessments. What the BSB does publish is the syllabus for each subject, a Chair’s report for each examination cycle, its paper on how the pass mark is set, and, for the pupillage Professional Ethics exam only, two practice papers in its Surpass exam system with mark schemes, plus an older BPTC sample short-answer paper with a mark scheme. It also provides a centrally set mock exam paper for each litigation exam, but that mock reaches you through your course provider (your AETO), not the BSB website. This page sets out exactly what is official, where to find it, what to make of the files on document-sharing sites, and how to use any mock so it actually raises your score. Independent — not affiliated with the Bar Standards Board. ProSyllabus is an independent study site and nothing here is official. Every exam fact and figure below is quoted or summarised from the BSB’s own documents, read on 27 October 2026.
BSB Bar Qualification Manual Part 3C, Chair’s Report Part 1 and the Professional Ethics exam page, read 27 October 2026.
What the BSB actually publishes
The Bar Qualification Manual, Part 3C, is the BSB’s own page on the centralised assessments. On mocks it says, in full: “We provide a centrally set mock exam paper for each of the centralised examinations. Mock exams are administered by AETOs and they will advise when the mock exam paper will be available.” In its list of questions you should take to your AETO rather than to the BSB, it includes “Mock examinations and revision materials”. So the one official litigation mock exists, but it is your provider who gives it to you and tells you when.
| Resource | Who publishes it | What it gives you | Past questions? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Criminal Litigation syllabus 2026, with a summary of changes and a tracked-changes version | BSB (Part 3B of the Bar Qualification Manual) | The 28 headings and, for each, the examinable material (paragraphs of Blackstone’s Criminal Practice 2026 and its Supplement 1, and named CrimPR provisions), with explanatory material marked as not assessed | No |
| Civil Litigation syllabus 2026-2027, with a summary of changes and a tracked-changes version | BSB (Part 3B of the Bar Qualification Manual) | The 24 headings and the examinable rules, Practice Directions and White Book commentary, plus the Jackson ADR Handbook (fourth edition, 2025) parts examinable in Paper 1 only | No |
| Chair’s Report Part 1 (all sittings) and Part 2 (latest sitting) | BSB Central Examinations Board | “Statistical data for each sit and interventions applied” (Part 3C), including pass rates and pass standards, and the Board’s decisions on selected questions | No: questions are discussed by number and legal point, not printed |
| Centrally set mock exam paper | BSB, administered by your AETO | One mock per centralised exam | Ask your AETO |
| Standard setting paper (19 August 2022) | BSB | How the pass standard is set by the Angoff method | No |
| Professional Ethics Practice Paper and Practice Paper Two, with mark schemes | BSB | Two practice assessments in the Surpass exam system, unmarked, unlimited attempts | Practice papers only; the BSB says it does not publish Ethics past papers |
| BPTC Ethics sample short-answer questions and mark scheme | BSB (linked from the Professional Ethics exam page) | Sample questions “previously used on the BPTC”; the BSB says the question style has not changed but the pupillage exam is marked differently | Sample questions, not a past paper |
From the BSB’s Bar Qualification Manual (Parts 3B and 3C), the Chair’s reports and the Professional Ethics exam page, read 27 October 2026.
Part 3C links the current Chair’s reports and says older ones can be requested: “Current reports are available below. Previous Chair’s reports are available on request from our Exams Team.” On 27 October 2026 it linked Part 1 and the April 2026 Part 2. The figures from the three Part 2 reports we saved (August 2025, December 2025 and April 2026) are set out in our pass marks and pass rates guide.
- 3 Criminal mocks of 75 questions
- 3 Civil mocks: Paper 1 and Paper 2
- Every answer explained
- A countdown study plan to the sitting
Why there are no litigation past papers
The BSB does not give a reason for the litigation papers in the pages we read. What its documents do show is that questions come from a bank and can be used again. Chair’s Report Part 1 says the examiners compile papers from “the bank of material used for compiling the centralised assessments”, and that “If a question has been used previously, consideration is also given to the statistics regarding the question’s prior performance.” The April 2026 report records the examining team agreeing to correct a typo “before reusing the question”. For the Ethics exam the BSB is explicit: “we do hold a bank of questions and therefore do not publish past papers.”
That has one practical consequence: none of the BSB pages we read publishes a litigation past paper, so nothing on those pages vouches for a document online that calls itself a BSB or BPTC litigation “past paper”. Check where any such file came from before you trust it. The BPTC also had centralised litigation exams, and each of the three Part 2 Chair’s reports we saved says (section 7.1.1): “the final opportunity to take an ‘old style’ BPTC 75 MCQ Civil Litigation paper was the April 2022 sit.” Its format differed from today’s two-paper Civil exam.
Free practice: what exists and how to judge it
Free question sets and videos for the litigation exams can be found online. Some are written by tutors and some by students; none is official, and we do not link them here. Before you rely on one, check three things against the BSB’s own documents:
| Check | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Which syllabus year it follows | The Criminal syllabus 2026 is based on Blackstone’s Criminal Practice 2026 with a cut-off date of 31 July 2025; the Civil syllabus 2026-27 on the White Book 2026 with a cut-off of 6 April 2026 and, for Paper 1 only, the Jackson ADR Handbook (fourth edition, 2025). Material written for an older edition can test rules that have moved or left the syllabus. |
| Which format it copies | Civil is now two papers: 50 closed-book questions, then 40 open-book questions including 5 rolling case scenarios of 7 questions. A single 75-question Civil paper is the old BPTC format. |
| Whether the answers are explained with a rule | An answer with no rule or section behind it cannot be checked. A question you cannot check can teach you the wrong rule. |
Uploads on document-sharing sites deserve extra care. The BSB pages we read do not vouch for them, they may follow an earlier syllabus year, and nothing tells you whether the attached answers were checked. We do not link them. If you use one, treat it as a set of topics to look up, not as a guide to the answer.
How long each paper gives you per question
| Paper | Time | Questions | Book | Average time per question (our arithmetic) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Criminal Litigation, Evidence and Sentencing | 3 hours | 75 MCQ and SBA questions | Closed book: writing materials only (“a writing utensil, if applicable”) | 2.4 minutes (2 min 24 s) |
| Civil Litigation Paper 1 | 2 hours | 50 MCQ and SBA questions | Closed book: writing materials only | 2.4 minutes (2 min 24 s) |
| Civil Litigation Paper 2 | 2.5 hours | 40: 5 stand-alone, then 5 rolling case scenarios of 7 questions | Open book: the White Book, Volumes 1 and 2 | 3.75 minutes (3 min 45 s) |
Our arithmetic from the durations and question numbers in the BSB’s Bar Qualification Manual Part 3C and Chair’s Report Part 1.
Paper 2 gives about 3.75 minutes a question against 2.4 in the closed-book papers (our arithmetic). The BSB does not give a reason in the pages we read; our advice is to use the extra time to look up and apply the rule in the White Book where a detail decides the answer. Criminal Litigation and Civil Paper 1 run at the same pace, about two and a half minutes a question.
How to use a mock so it raises your score
A mock earns its value only if you sit it the way you will sit the real paper and then work through every mark you dropped. The routine below is ours; the conditions in it are the BSB’s.
| Step | What to do (our suggestion) |
|---|---|
| 1. Sit it timed, in one go | Three hours for 75 Criminal questions; two hours for 50 Civil Paper 1 questions; two and a half hours for 40 Civil Paper 2 questions. Stop when the time is up, even with questions left. |
| 2. Match the book rules | Criminal and Civil Paper 1: writing materials only (follow your AETO’s instructions on what to bring). Civil Paper 2: your White Book, Volumes 1 and 2, which may be highlighted and annotated and carry sticky page markers and sticky notes, but no loose sheets. |
| 3. Mark and log every miss by syllabus heading | Write down the heading number (1-28 Criminal, 1-24 Civil), the rule you needed, and why you chose the wrong option: did not know it, misread the facts, or ran out of time. |
| 4. Go to the syllabus, not the answer key | For each miss, read the paragraphs the syllabus lists for that heading. The answer to one question rarely covers the rule the next question will test. |
| 5. Count your errors by heading | After two mocks, the headings with three or more misses are your revision list. Re-sit a mock only when you have worked through them. |
The Paper 2 White Book routine
In Paper 2 the risk is spending too long in the book. A routine that keeps you moving: first decide which CPR Part the question is about from the facts (for example service, default judgment, relief from sanctions, Part 36); go to that Part’s rule; then check the Practice Direction that supplements it; read the commentary only if the rule does not settle the point. Tab the examinable Parts you find yourself looking up most often in practice, because the BSB allows sticky page markers. Our Civil Litigation guide sets out the permitted materials word for word and the time arithmetic for rolling scenarios.
- 3 Criminal mocks of 75 questions
- 3 Civil mocks: Paper 1 and Paper 2
- Every answer explained
- A countdown study plan to the sitting
Three Criminal Litigation questions to try
Below are three single best answer questions in the style of the Criminal Litigation paper, each with the answer and the reasoning. Sit them at the exam’s pace, about two and a half minutes each, before you read the answer.
Question 1 · Hearsay evidence
Minutes after being stabbed, and while bleeding heavily, Callum Ward shouted to a passer-by, 'Tony Briggs did this!' Ward died before trial. The prosecution wish to adduce what he said. On which basis is it most likely to be admitted?
- Previous complaint: the statement was made by a victim to another person about conduct amounting to the offence charged.
- Res gestae: he was so emotionally overpowered by the event that the possibility of concoction or distortion can be disregarded.
- Confession: the statement accuses another person of the offence and so is admissible against that person at trial.
- Business document: the passer-by received the statement and passed it on to the police officer who recorded it in the course of his duty.
Answer: B. CJA 2003 s.118(1) preserves the common law res gestae rule, including a statement made by a person so emotionally overpowered by an event that the possibility of concoction or distortion can be disregarded. A spontaneous accusation minutes after a stabbing is a classic example; s.116 (death) could also apply. The previous complaint rule in s.120 needs the complainant to testify, and only the maker's own admissions are confessions.
From the ProSyllabus BSB Criminal Litigation mock test: an original question, not a BSB exam or past question. It is one of that test’s three free questions.
Question 2 · Inferences from silence and other conduct
Before interview, Leon handed over a prepared statement saying he bought the laptop from a man at a car boot sale for £80, and then answered 'no comment' to all questions. At trial he gives the same account and adds nothing new. Can a s.34 inference be drawn?
- Yes, because his refusal to answer questions in interview is itself a failure within s.34
- No, because s.34 cannot apply at all where the suspect has received legal advice at the station
- Yes, because a prepared statement is never a substitute for answering questions under caution
- No, because every fact he relies on at trial was mentioned in the prepared statement
Answer: D. Section 34 bites on failure to mention facts later relied on, not on silence as such. If a prepared statement contains all the facts relied on at trial, there is no failure to mention them and no s.34 inference arises (Knight), though an inconsistency between the statement and the evidence may be relevant in other ways.
From the ProSyllabus BSB Criminal Litigation mock test: an original question, not a BSB exam or past question. It is one of that test’s three free questions.
Question 3 · Sentencing principles
Dean is charged with an either-way offence. At his first hearing in the magistrates' court, when asked, he indicates a guilty plea. He is committed to the Crown Court for sentence. Under the Sentencing Council's guilty plea guideline, what is the maximum reduction he should receive?
- One-quarter
- One-tenth
- One-third
- One-fifth
Answer: C. The court must take into account the stage at which the offender indicated an intention to plead guilty and the circumstances (Sentencing Act 2020 s.73). Under the guideline, a plea indicated at the first stage of proceedings, normally the first hearing at which a plea or indication is sought, attracts a maximum reduction of one-third. Committal for sentence does not reduce that entitlement.
From the ProSyllabus BSB Criminal Litigation mock test: an original question, not a BSB exam or past question. It is one of that test’s three free questions.
| Question | Syllabus heading | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hearsay evidence | B: Res gestae: he was so emotionally overpowered by the event that the possibility of concoction or distortion can be disregarded. |
| 2 | Inferences from silence and other conduct | D: No, because every fact he relies on at trial was mentioned in the prepared statement |
| 3 | Sentencing principles | C: One-third |
The table repeats the three answers for readers on a version of this page that does not show the cards.
Practise under exam conditions: the BSB litigation resit bundle covers both Criminal and Civil Litigation, three free questions first.
What the Chair’s reports can teach you
A Chair’s report is not a past paper, but it is the closest official record of how a paper behaved. For each subject it gives the pass standard, the pass rate, statistical summaries such as how many questions had a low pass rate, and the Board’s decisions on selected questions. In April 2026 there were 9 Criminal Litigation questions with an all-provider pass rate below 40% (14 in December 2025), and 13 of the 90 Civil questions with a passing rate of 40% or below (17 in December 2025). It also reports how questions scored by position: across the first 25 Criminal questions the average pass rate was 68%, across questions 26 to 50 it was 59%, and across 51 to 75 it was 63%, and the report found “no significant evidence suggesting a fall-off in candidate performance during the examination”.
| From the April 2026 report | Figure |
|---|---|
| Criminal questions below 40% pass rate | 9 of 75 (14 in December 2025) |
| Civil questions at or below 40% pass rate, both papers | 13 of 90 (17 in December 2025) |
| Criminal average pass rate, questions 1-25 / 26-50 / 51-75 | 68% / 59% / 63% |
| Civil Paper 1 average pass rate, questions 1-25 / 26-50 | 57% / 63% |
| Civil Paper 2, first five stand-alone questions | 50% average pass rate, lower than any rolling case scenario |
From the BSB Central Examinations Board Chair’s Report Part 2, April 2026 sitting, sections 2.2 and 3.2.
The reports also record when the Board changed a result: for example, the December 2025 Civil pass standard was set at 47 out of 89 after one Paper 1 question was suppressed. The dates and review rules that follow from a report are in our dates, results and resits guide, and the full exam page is the BSB centralised assessments exam page.
Frequently asked questions
Does the BSB publish past papers for Criminal or Civil Litigation?
Not on any BSB page we read. The BSB publishes the syllabuses, the Chair’s reports and its standard-setting paper. It provides one centrally set mock exam paper for each centralised exam, and your AETO administers it and tells you when it is available.
Where can I get an official BSB mock paper?
From your AETO. The Bar Qualification Manual says the BSB provides a centrally set mock for each centralised exam and that mock exams are administered by AETOs, who will advise when the paper is available.
Are BPTC past papers useful for Bar Training?
None of the BSB pages we read publishes BPTC litigation past papers, so nothing official vouches for documents shared online under that name; check where they came from. The Chair’s reports say the final “old style” BPTC 75 MCQ Civil Litigation paper was the April 2022 sit; today’s Civil exam is two papers totalling 90 questions, so the format differs.
Are there free BSB practice tests?
For the pupillage Professional Ethics exam, yes: the BSB publishes two practice papers in its Surpass exam system with mark schemes, and an older BPTC sample short-answer paper with a mark scheme. For the litigation exams we found no free BSB practice paper on its pages; free question sets and videos exist online but are not official.
How should I sit a mock for Civil Paper 2?
Two and a half hours for 40 questions, with your White Book Volumes 1 and 2, which may be highlighted, annotated and tabbed with sticky markers and notes, but with no loose sheets.
Are the questions on this page real BSB questions?
No. They are original questions from the ProSyllabus BSB Criminal Litigation mock test, written to the BSB syllabus. They are not BSB exam or past questions and the BSB has not written or endorsed them.
Sources
- official — BSB: Bar Qualification Manual, Part 3C Centralised assessments (exam format, permitted materials, standard setting, examination dates, results review process)
- official — BSB: Bar Qualification Manual (whole PDF, including Part 3B Bar Training Syllabi and the 2020 change to attempts)
- official — BSB Central Examinations Board: Chair’s Report Part 1, Bar Training, BTT, BPTC and BTR, all sittings
- official — BSB Central Examinations Board: Chair’s Report Part 2, April 2026 sitting (dated 25 July 2026)
- official — BSB Central Examinations Board: Chair’s Report Part 2, December 2025 sitting (dated 2 April 2026)
- official — BSB Central Examinations Board: Chair’s Report Part 2, August 2025 sitting (dated 25 November 2025)
- official — BSB: Criminal litigation, evidence and sentencing, Bar Training Syllabus 2026 (final version, 10 December 2025)
- official — BSB: Civil litigation and evidence, Bar Training Syllabus 2026-2027 (24 June 2026)
- official — BSB: Standard setting, vocational component examinations (19 August 2022)
- official — BSB: Pupillage / work-based learning component, Professional Ethics Exam (format, 2027 dates, fees, practice assessments, FAQs)
- official — BSB: Professional Ethics Practice Paper (Surpass practice assessment)
- official — BSB: Professional Ethics Practice Paper Two (Surpass practice assessment)
- official — BSB: BPTC Ethics sample paper and mark scheme (older BPTC material the BSB still links)
official = a document published by the conducting body. reported = a news or coaching site we could not check against an original. Where sources disagree this page says so rather than picking one.
